Leypoldt J K, Blindauer K M
Research Service, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah 84148.
Blood Purif. 1994;12(6):327-36. doi: 10.1159/000170181.
Previous estimates of the peritoneal solvent drag reflection coefficient (sigma) are widely disparate; some are outside the range expected for a semipermeable membrane (i.e., between 0 and 1). We have evaluated a novel method for determining sigma in a rabbit model of peritoneal dialysis. Test solute was infused intravenously, and sequential 2-hour isotonic and hypertonic exchanges (40 ml/kg) were performed in random order. Test solute was also added to the instilled hypertonic dialysis solution to inhibit transperitoneal solute diffusion during this exchange. Eight experiments were performed with creatinine as test solute and glucose as osmotic solute, and six experiments were performed with glucose as test solute and mannitol as osmotic solute. When using isotonic dialysis solution, the dialysate/plasma concentration ratio (D/P) for both test solutes increased throughout the exchange (p < 0.001). When using hypertonic dialysis solution, D/P creatinine was initially near 1 and decreased during the 1st hour of the exchange (p < 0.05); D/P glucose (as test solute) was initially 0.82 +/- (SEM) 0.07 and did not change during the exchange. The peritoneal diffusive permeability-area product (PA) was determined by fitting a mathematical model to the time dependence of the dialysate test solute concentration during the isotonic exchange using PA as an adjustable parameter, and sigma was determined in like manner during the hypertonic exchange using sigma as an adjustable parameter (and assuming a PA value equal to that during the isotonic exchange). The creatinine PA (1.37 +/- 0.28 ml/min) was higher than that for glucose (0.62 +/- 0.07 ml/min) as expected based on their solution diffusion coefficients. Creatinine and glucose sigma values were 0.38 +/- 0.06 and 0.43 +/- 0.05, respectively. We conclude that peritoneal sigma values for creatinine and glucose are within the physiological range.
先前对腹膜溶剂拖曳反射系数(σ)的估计差异很大;有些超出了半透膜预期的范围(即0到1之间)。我们评估了一种在兔腹膜透析模型中测定σ的新方法。将测试溶质静脉内输注,并以随机顺序进行连续2小时的等渗和高渗交换(40 ml/kg)。在注入的高渗透析液中也添加了测试溶质,以抑制此次交换过程中的跨腹膜溶质扩散。以肌酐作为测试溶质、葡萄糖作为渗透溶质进行了8次实验,以葡萄糖作为测试溶质、甘露醇作为渗透溶质进行了6次实验。使用等渗透析液时,两种测试溶质的透析液/血浆浓度比(D/P)在整个交换过程中均升高(p < 0.001)。使用高渗透析液时,肌酐的D/P最初接近1,并在交换的第1小时内下降(p < 0.05);葡萄糖(作为测试溶质)的D/P最初为0.82±(标准误)0.07,在交换过程中未发生变化。腹膜扩散通透面积乘积(PA)通过将数学模型拟合到等渗交换期间透析液测试溶质浓度随时间的变化来确定,其中PA为可调参数,而在高渗交换期间以类似方式确定σ,其中σ为可调参数(并假设PA值等于等渗交换期间的值)。基于肌酐和葡萄糖的溶液扩散系数,肌酐的PA(1.37±0.28 ml/min)高于葡萄糖的PA(0.62±0.07 ml/min)。肌酐和葡萄糖的σ值分别为0.38±0.06和0.43±0.05。我们得出结论,肌酐和葡萄糖的腹膜σ值在生理范围内。