• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[IgA和IgM型血清学反应在急性弓形虫病诊断中的比较研究]

[Comparative study of the serologic response of IgA and IgM type in the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis].

作者信息

Lafarga B, Cañas A, Pérez M C, Suárez J, Elcuaz R

机构信息

Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Nuestra Señora del Pino, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1994 Dec;12(10):501-4.

PMID:7865558
Abstract

BACKGROUND

IgM serologic response in the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis presents interpretation problems. A comparative study with IgA detection of antibodies was performed.

METHODS

A parallel serologic study was carried out with IgM and IgA enzymoimmunoassay enhancement techniques in the sera of patients suspected of having toxoplasmosis.

RESULTS

Positive results for IgM and/or IgA were presented in 74 sera (47 patients): 86.3% for the former and 58.9% for the latter (p < 0.001). The group of IgA-/IgA+ sera presented a low mean of proportionality index (PI): 1.6 versus the IgM+ sera group in the context of IgG seroconversion with a PI of 3.4 (p < 0.001). Out of the 9 patients with demonstrated IgG, all were IgA+ and seven IgM+.

CONCLUSIONS

The present data seem to support greater specificity of the determination of IgA antibodies than that of IgM in the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis.

摘要

背景

IgM血清学反应在急性弓形虫病诊断中存在解读问题。开展了一项与IgA抗体检测的对比研究。

方法

采用IgM和IgA酶免疫分析增强技术,对疑似弓形虫病患者的血清进行平行血清学研究。

结果

74份血清(47例患者)中IgM和/或IgA呈阳性结果:前者为86.3%,后者为58.9%(p<0.001)。在IgG血清转换情况下,IgA - /IgA +血清组的比例指数(PI)均值较低:为1.6,而IgM +血清组的PI为3.4(p<0.001)。在9例IgG得到证实的患者中,全部为IgA +,7例为IgM +。

结论

目前的数据似乎支持在急性弓形虫病诊断中,IgA抗体检测比IgM检测具有更高的特异性。

相似文献

1
[Comparative study of the serologic response of IgA and IgM type in the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis].[IgA和IgM型血清学反应在急性弓形虫病诊断中的比较研究]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1994 Dec;12(10):501-4.
2
[Use of the ISAGA method in detection of specific IgM, IgA, IgE antibodies in acquired and congenital toxoplasmosis].[ISAGA方法在检测获得性和先天性弓形虫病特异性IgM、IgA、IgE抗体中的应用]
Wiad Parazytol. 1997;43(1):39-51.
3
Evaluation of a commercial IgE ELISA in comparison with IgA and IgM ELISAs, IgG avidity assay and complement fixation for the diagnosis of acute toxoplasmosis.与IgA和IgM酶联免疫吸附测定法、IgG亲和力测定法及补体结合试验相比,评估一种用于诊断急性弓形虫病的商用IgE酶联免疫吸附测定法。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2007 Jan;13(1):40-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01564.x.
4
[Diagnostic use of ELISA, IgG, IgM, IgA and ELISA IgG avidity in recent and chronic toxoplasmosis].[酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)、IgG、IgM、IgA及ELISA IgG亲和力在近期和慢性弓形虫病诊断中的应用]
Bol Chil Parasitol. 2000 Jan-Jun;55(1-2):17-24.
5
[Comparison of the diagnostic usefulness of immunoglobulins A and M in acute toxoplasmosis].[免疫球蛋白A和M在急性弓形虫病诊断中的应用比较]
Rev Invest Clin. 1993 Nov-Dec;45(6):585-8.
6
[Evaluation of the usefulness examination of IgG avidity for serodiagnosis of toxoplasmosis].[评估IgG亲和力检测在弓形虫病血清学诊断中的应用价值]
Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2002 Aug;13(74):111-5.
7
[Problems and limitations of conventional and innovative methods for the diagnosis of Toxoplasmosis in humans and animals].[人类和动物弓形虫病诊断的传统方法与创新方法的问题及局限性]
Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):177-81.
8
Assessment of the value of detecting specific IgA antibodies for the diagnosis of a recently acquired primary Toxoplasma infection.检测特异性IgA抗体在诊断近期获得性原发性弓形虫感染中的价值评估。
Prenat Diagn. 2008 Aug;28(8):749-52. doi: 10.1002/pd.2052.
9
Serological IgG, IgM and IgA diagnosis and prognosis of mycobacterial diseases in routine practice.常规实践中分枝杆菌病的血清学IgG、IgM和IgA诊断及预后
Eur J Med Res. 1996 May 24;1(8):393-403.
10
Diagnosis of congenital toxoplasmosis: pre- and post-natal evaluation in Sicilian (Italy) epidemiological area. Preliminary data.先天性弓形虫病的诊断:意大利西西里岛流行区的产前和产后评估。初步数据。
Parassitologia. 2007 Jun;49(1-2):39-41.