Suppr超能文献

原发性乳腺癌中的组织多肽抗原和组织多肽特异性抗原。血清和肿瘤组织中的评估。

Tissue polypeptide antigen and tissue polypeptide specific antigen in primary breast cancer. Evaluation in serum and tumour tissue.

作者信息

Gion M, Mione R, Barioli P, Sartorello P, Capitanio G

机构信息

Centro Regionale per lo Studio degli Indicatori Biochimici di Tumore, Ospedale Civile, Venezia, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem. 1994 Oct;32(10):779-87. doi: 10.1515/cclm.1994.32.10.779.

Abstract

Tissue polypeptide antigen, measured by both a polyclonal antibody (TPA IRMA Prolifigen) and a monoclonal antibody prototype kit (TPA-M IRMA Prolifigen), and the tissue polypeptide specific antigen were evaluated. The markers were measured in 266 serum samples and in 291 tumour cytosols from patients with primary breast cancer. The three markers were available in matched pairs of both serum and cytosol from the same patient in 144 cases. Diagnostic sensitivity of serum levels of the three markers was not significantly different when using cut-off values calculated on the basis of healthy subjects. In the cytosol, tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA IRMA), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA) and tissue polypeptide specific antigen were significantly correlated with steroid receptor status, while their serum levels were not. Cytosol and serum levels of the three markers were not significantly associated. All three were significantly correlated both in serum and in cytosol. The association was closer between tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA IRMA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA) than between each of these two markers and tissue polypeptide specific antigen. From these findings we draw the following conclusions: 1. Tissue polypeptide specific antigen (TPA IRMA) and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA) probably provide superimposable information both in serum and in cytosol; 2. Tissue polypeptide specific antigen and tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA IRMA) or tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA-M IRMA), although closely associated, probably measure in part different cytokeratins. Therefore, they should not be considered interchangeable in individual patients; 3. The determination of the markers in serum and in cytosol provides different information concerning the tumour phenotype.

摘要

使用多克隆抗体(TPA IRMA Prolifigen)和单克隆抗体原型试剂盒(TPA-M IRMA Prolifigen)对组织多肽抗原以及组织多肽特异性抗原进行了评估。在266份血清样本和291例原发性乳腺癌患者的肿瘤细胞溶胶中对这些标志物进行了检测。在144例患者中,三种标志物在同一患者的血清和细胞溶胶中均有配对样本。当使用基于健康受试者计算的临界值时,三种标志物血清水平的诊断敏感性无显著差异。在细胞溶胶中,组织多肽抗原(TPA IRMA)、组织多肽抗原(TPA-M IRMA)和组织多肽特异性抗原与类固醇受体状态显著相关,而它们的血清水平则不然。三种标志物的细胞溶胶和血清水平无显著关联。三种标志物在血清和细胞溶胶中均显著相关。组织多肽抗原(TPA IRMA)和组织多肽抗原(TPA-M IRMA)之间的关联比这两种标志物与组织多肽特异性抗原之间的关联更紧密。从这些发现中我们得出以下结论:1. 组织多肽特异性抗原(TPA IRMA)和组织多肽抗原(TPA-M IRMA)在血清和细胞溶胶中可能提供可叠加的信息;2. 组织多肽特异性抗原与组织多肽抗原(TPA IRMA)或组织多肽抗原(TPA-M IRMA)虽然密切相关,但可能部分测量的是不同的细胞角蛋白。因此,在个体患者中不应将它们视为可互换的;3. 在血清和细胞溶胶中测定这些标志物可提供关于肿瘤表型的不同信息。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验