• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰臀比与男女医生对女性身材吸引力和健康程度的判断

Waist-to-hip ratio and judgment of attractiveness and healthiness of female figures by male and female physicians.

作者信息

Singh D

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Texas, Austin 78712.

出版信息

Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994 Nov;18(11):731-7.

PMID:7866472
Abstract

Sexual dimorphism in body fat distribution as measured by waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) is unique to humans. The WHR has been shown to be an accurate predictor of risk for various diseases, premature mortality, degree of androgenicity/estrogenicity and fecundity of women, independent of overall body weight. This study investigated whether physicians would be influenced by body size or WHR in assessing health, youthfulness, and reproductive capability of a woman. Line drawings of 12 female figures representing three categories of body weight (normal, underweight and overweight) and four sizes of WHR (0.7, 0.8, 0.9 and 1.0) were ranked by male and female physicians for these qualities as well as for attractiveness and intelligence. Both males and females assigned higher ranking for many of these qualities to normal weight figures with low WHRs (0.7 and 0.8). Overweight figures were assigned low rankings for all these qualities except reproductive capability. Underweight figures, regardless of WHR size, were assigned low ranking for reproductive capability and those underweight figures that had high WHRs (0.9 and 1.0) were assigned low ranking for healthiness. While there were minor sex differences in ranking of some attributes for some figures, generally both male and female physicians utilized the WHR in a similar manner to infer healthiness, reproductive capability and attractiveness.

摘要

通过腰臀比(WHR)衡量的身体脂肪分布的性别差异是人类独有的。WHR已被证明是各种疾病风险、过早死亡、雄激素化/雌激素化程度以及女性生育能力的准确预测指标,与总体体重无关。本研究调查了医生在评估女性的健康、年轻程度和生殖能力时是否会受到体型或WHR的影响。12名女性人体线条图代表了三种体重类别(正常、体重过轻和超重)以及四种WHR尺寸(0.7、0.8、0.9和1.0),男性和女性医生对这些女性的这些特质以及吸引力和智力进行排名。男性和女性都将许多这些特质的较高排名赋予了WHR较低(0.7和0.8)的正常体重身材。超重身材在所有这些特质上的排名都很低,但生殖能力除外。体重过轻的身材,无论WHR大小,在生殖能力方面排名较低,而那些WHR较高(0.9和1.0)的体重过轻身材在健康方面排名较低。虽然在某些身材的某些属性排名上存在微小的性别差异,但总体而言,男性和女性医生以类似的方式利用WHR来推断健康状况、生殖能力和吸引力。

相似文献

1
Waist-to-hip ratio and judgment of attractiveness and healthiness of female figures by male and female physicians.腰臀比与男女医生对女性身材吸引力和健康程度的判断
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1994 Nov;18(11):731-7.
2
Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: role of waist-to-hip ratio.女性身体吸引力的适应性意义:腰臀比的作用。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1993 Aug;65(2):293-307. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.65.2.293.
3
Female mate value at a glance: relationship of waist-to-hip ratio to health, fecundity and attractiveness.女性配偶价值一瞥:腰臀比与健康、生育能力及吸引力的关系。
Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2002 Dec;23 Suppl 4:81-91.
4
Big and beautiful: attractiveness and health ratings of the female body by male "fat admirers".丰满且美丽:男性“胖美人爱好者”对女性身体的吸引力及健康评分
Arch Sex Behav. 2009 Apr;38(2):201-8. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9200-5. Epub 2007 Aug 7.
5
Ideal female body shape: role of body weight and waist-to-hip ratio.理想女性体型:体重与腰臀比的作用
Int J Eat Disord. 1994 Nov;16(3):283-8. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(199411)16:3<283::aid-eat2260160309>3.0.co;2-q.
6
Mating strategies of young women: role of physical attractiveness.年轻女性的交配策略:身体吸引力的作用。
J Sex Res. 2004 Feb;41(1):43-54. doi: 10.1080/00224490409552212.
7
The relative influence of facial neoteny and waist-to-hip ratio on judgements of female attractiveness and fecundity.面部幼态持续和腰臀比在女性吸引力和生育能力判断上的相对影响。
Psychol Health Med. 2006 May;11(2):129-41. doi: 10.1080/13548500500155982.
8
Men's ratings of female attractiveness are influenced more by changes in female waist size compared with changes in hip size.与臀部尺寸的变化相比,男性对女性吸引力的评分受女性腰围变化的影响更大。
Biol Psychol. 2005 Mar;68(3):299-308. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.04.007.
9
Patterns of subcutaneous fat deposition and the relationship between body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio: implications for models of physical attractiveness.皮下脂肪沉积模式以及体重指数与腰臀比之间的关系:对身体吸引力模型的启示
J Theor Biol. 2009 Feb 7;256(3):343-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.09.041. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
10
Prevalence of metabolic syndrome among Filipino adults aged 20 years and over.20岁及以上菲律宾成年人代谢综合征的患病率。
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2003;12(3):271-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Techniques and Applications of Lower Extremity Feminization and Masculinization.下肢女性化和男性化的技术与应用
Transgend Health. 2023 Feb 8;8(1):45-55. doi: 10.1089/trgh.2020.0178. eCollection 2023 Feb.
2
Short-term and long-term mate preference in men and women in an Iranian population.伊朗人群中男性和女性的短期和长期伴侣偏好。
Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 21;11(1):20752. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99653-7.
3
Look at Your Hair the Way You Look at Your Face: Concept of Total Facial Skin and Hair Care.像对待脸部一样对待你的头发:全脸皮肤与头发护理理念。
Skin Appendage Disord. 2020 Mar;6(2):67-76. doi: 10.1159/000504306. Epub 2020 Feb 5.
4
Evolutionary Psychology of Eating Disorders: An Explorative Study in Patients With Anorexia Nervosa and Bulimia Nervosa.饮食失调的进化心理学:对神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症患者的一项探索性研究。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 31;9:2122. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02122. eCollection 2018.
5
The relationship of female physical attractiveness to body fatness.女性身体吸引力与体脂率的关系。
PeerJ. 2015 Aug 25;3:e1155. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1155. eCollection 2015.
6
Optimal waist-to-hip ratios in women activate neural reward centers in men.女性的最佳腰臀比会激活男性的神经奖励中枢。
PLoS One. 2010 Feb 5;5(2):e9042. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009042.
7
Sexual dimorphism of the pelvic architecture: a struggling response to destructive and parsimonious forces by natural & mate selection.骨盆结构的两性异形:自然选择与配偶选择对破坏性和简约性力量的挣扎回应。
Mcgill J Med. 2006 Jan;9(1):61-6.
8
Time to first pregnancy among women working in agricultural production.从事农业生产工作的女性首次怀孕的时间。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005 Jul;78(6):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00420-005-0615-9. Epub 2005 May 26.