Ware R C
J Anal Psychol. 1995 Jan;40(1):5-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-5922.1995.00005.x.
The increasing importance and frequency of so-called 'false memories' of sexual abuse, which in reality never occurred, occasions a theoretical reflection about therapy-induced 'memories' of sexual abuse. Sexual abuse is first seen to involve a serious loss of psychic structure. As such it has much in common with other, endogenous forms of severe psychic disorders. Drawing upon the (Kleinian) categories of projective identification, projective counter-identification and psychotic personality aspects, together with the Jungian conception of the 'mutual unconsciousness' between therapist and patient, the author presents a psychodynamic hypothesis regarding the origins of 'false memories' or 'recovered memories' of sexual abuse. This is exemplified with two therapy cases involving such memories of abuse.
所谓性虐待“错误记忆”(实际上从未发生过)的重要性和出现频率日益增加,引发了对治疗诱导的性虐待“记忆”的理论反思。性虐待首先被视为涉及心理结构的严重丧失。因此,它与其他内源性严重心理障碍形式有许多共同之处。作者借鉴(克莱因派)投射性认同、投射性反认同和精神病性人格方面的类别,以及荣格关于治疗师与患者之间“相互无意识”的概念,提出了一个关于性虐待“错误记忆”或“恢复记忆”起源的心理动力学假设。这通过两个涉及此类虐待记忆的治疗案例得到了例证。