Ogata R T, Low P J, Kawakami M
Medical Biology Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037.
J Immunol. 1995 Mar 1;154(5):2351-7.
Ra-reactive factor (RaRF) is a serum bactericidal factor whose function seems to be to activate C in a manner similar to that of C1, but with activation triggered by binding to bacterial polysaccharides instead of to immune complexes. It is composed of multiple polysaccharide-binding subunits associated with a novel serine protease, and its overall structural organization is similar to that of C1. This similarity extends to the serine protease component, which shares a similar modular construction and about 40% sequence identity with the C1r and C1s subcomponents of C1. In this study, we examined the substrate specificity of mouse RaRF by assaying its ability to cleave C components C3, C4, and C5, and its activity against the murine C4 isotype, sex-limited protein. Our results revealed that RaRF preferentially cleaves the C4 alpha-chain with specific activities 20- to 100-fold greater than either human or murine C1s, and that RaRF also cleaves the C3 alpha-chain, but with a lower efficiency than C4 alpha. We also found that RaRF is much less sensitive than C1s to mutations near the proteolytic site and that the two proteases show different reactivities against synthetic substrates. Hence, although the RaRF protease and C1s have similar structures and play similar roles in C activation, they also display clear differences in substrate range and in the details of their substrate recognition mechanisms. Finally, we found that RaRF does not cleave sex-limited protein even at a level 100-fold higher than necessary for C4 cleavage.
类风湿反应因子(RaRF)是一种血清杀菌因子,其功能似乎是以类似于C1的方式激活补体,但激活是由与细菌多糖结合而非免疫复合物结合触发的。它由与一种新型丝氨酸蛋白酶相关的多个多糖结合亚基组成,其整体结构组织与C1相似。这种相似性延伸到丝氨酸蛋白酶成分,该成分与C1的C1r和C1s亚成分具有相似的模块化结构和约40%的序列同一性。在本研究中,我们通过检测小鼠RaRF切割补体成分C3、C4和C5的能力及其对小鼠C4同种型、性限制蛋白的活性,来研究其底物特异性。我们的结果显示,RaRF优先切割C4α链,其比人或小鼠C1s的比活性高20至100倍,并且RaRF也切割C3α链,但效率低于C4α链。我们还发现,RaRF对蛋白水解位点附近的突变比C1s不敏感得多,并且这两种蛋白酶对合成底物表现出不同的反应性。因此,尽管RaRF蛋白酶和C1s具有相似的结构并且在补体激活中发挥相似的作用,但它们在底物范围和底物识别机制的细节上也表现出明显差异。最后,我们发现即使在比切割C4所需水平高100倍的情况下,RaRF也不切割性限制蛋白。