Hoffman D C, Wise R A
Department of Psychology, Concordia University, Montreal, Canada.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;110(4):402-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02244645.
Rats were given daily injections of bromocriptine (5.0 mg/kg IP) or vehicle either in the home cage or in a test box equipped with photocells to measure locomotion. The animals were then tested in the photocell boxes for their locomotor response to cocaine (10.0 mg/kg IP), heroin (0.5 mg/kg IP), or quinpirole (0.1 mg/kg IP). Repeated bromocriptine in the test box but not in the home cage caused progressive increases in sensitivity to the locomotor-stimulating effects of bromocriptine and increases in the subsequent sensitivity to quinpirole but caused only trivial signs of cross-sensitization to cocaine or heroin. Cross-sensitization to quinpirole was temporary; responsiveness to quinpirole decreased with further quinpirole injections. Lack of significant cross-sensitization between bromocriptine and either cocaine or heroin and lack of permanence of the cross-sensitization between bromocriptine and quinpirole raise questions as to the biological basis of psychomotor stimulant sensitization.
大鼠每天在饲养笼或配备光电管以测量运动的测试箱中腹腔注射溴隐亭(5.0毫克/千克)或赋形剂。然后将动物置于光电管箱中,测试它们对可卡因(10.0毫克/千克腹腔注射)、海洛因(0.5毫克/千克腹腔注射)或喹吡罗(0.1毫克/千克腹腔注射)的运动反应。在测试箱而非饲养笼中重复注射溴隐亭会导致对溴隐亭运动刺激作用的敏感性逐渐增加,以及随后对喹吡罗的敏感性增加,但对可卡因或海洛因仅产生轻微的交叉致敏迹象。对喹吡罗的交叉致敏是暂时的;随着进一步注射喹吡罗,对喹吡罗的反应性会降低。溴隐亭与可卡因或海洛因之间缺乏显著的交叉致敏,以及溴隐亭与喹吡罗之间交叉致敏的不持久性,引发了关于精神运动兴奋剂致敏生物学基础的问题。