Ryan C N, Evenden J L, Petterson M
Astra Arcus, Södertälje, Sweden.
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1993;112(1):34-44. doi: 10.1007/BF02247361.
In the present experiments, the effects of the azapirone anxiolytics, buspirone and ipsapirone, on excessive drinking induced by a FT-60 schedule of food delivery (schedule induced polydipsia, SIP) were investigated. Because buspirone is known to block dopamine receptors and both buspirone and ipsapirone act as agonists at the 5-HT1A receptor, their effects on polydipsia were compared to raclopride, an antagonist at D2 receptors, and 8-OH-DPAT, an agonist at the 5-HT1A receptor, thus providing information about the relative importance of the serotonergic and/or dopaminergic systems for the maintenance of polydipsia. The effects of all four drugs were investigated both acutely, and following repeated treatment. The doses employed were as follows: buspirone, 1.0, 3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg; raclopride, 0.05, 0.15, and 0.5 mg/kg; 8-OH-DPAT, 0.1, and 1.0 mg/kg and ipsapirone, 1.0, 3.0, 10.0 mg/kg. Administered acutely, the lowest doses of buspirone and raclopride did not alter drinking, whilst the low dose of 8-OH-DPAT significantly reduced polydipsia. These effects were reversed following repeated treatment over 16 successive days. Buspirone 1.0 mg/kg and 0.05 mg/kg raclopride reduced drinking, whilst tolerance developed to the effects of 0.1 mg/kg 8-OH-DPAT. Ipsapirone, at low doses, was without effect on drinking. At high doses, all four drugs reduced drinking both acutely and chronically. Repeated treatment with buspirone (3.0, and 10.0 mg/kg) reduced licking and panel entries, but induced a selective decrease in licking at the low dose (1.0 mg/kg). Similar effects were seen following raclopride treatment, although the effects were less selective. 8-OH-DPAT and ipsapirone, in contrast reduced licking only at the highest dose, and both drugs increased panel entries as testing continued. The effects of buspirone resembled those of raclopride whereas the effects of ipsapirone resembled those of 8-OH-DPAT. Buspirone appears to act as a dopamine antagonist in this test. The effects of the drugs suggest that SIP depends upon motivational and performance factors which may be more sensitive to drug manipulation than potential underlying psychological factors such as anxiety or stress.
在当前实验中,研究了氮杂螺环酮类抗焦虑药丁螺环酮和伊沙匹隆对由FT - 60食物递送时间表诱导的过度饮水(时间表诱导的烦渴,SIP)的影响。由于已知丁螺环酮可阻断多巴胺受体,且丁螺环酮和伊沙匹隆均作为5 - HT1A受体的激动剂,因此将它们对烦渴的影响与D2受体拮抗剂雷氯必利和5 - HT1A受体激动剂8 - OH - DPAT进行比较,从而提供有关血清素能和/或多巴胺能系统对维持烦渴的相对重要性的信息。对这四种药物的影响进行了急性和重复治疗后的研究。所用剂量如下:丁螺环酮,1.0、3.0和10.0mg/kg;雷氯必利,0.05、0.15和0.5mg/kg;8 - OH - DPAT,0.1和1.0mg/kg;伊沙匹隆,1.0、3.0、10.0mg/kg。急性给药时,丁螺环酮和雷氯必利的最低剂量未改变饮水,而低剂量的8 - OH - DPAT显著减少了烦渴。在连续16天的重复治疗后,这些作用发生了逆转。1.0mg/kg丁螺环酮和0.05mg/kg雷氯必利减少了饮水,而对0.1mg/kg 8 - OH - DPAT的作用产生了耐受性。低剂量的伊沙匹隆对饮水无影响。高剂量时,所有四种药物在急性和慢性给药时均减少了饮水。用丁螺环酮(3.0和10.0mg/kg)重复治疗减少了舔舐和触碰面板次数,但低剂量(1.0mg/kg)时仅引起舔舐的选择性减少。雷氯必利治疗后也观察到类似效果,尽管效果不太具有选择性。相比之下,8 - OH - DPAT和伊沙匹隆仅在最高剂量时减少舔舐,并且随着测试的继续,两种药物均增加了触碰面板次数。丁螺环酮的作用类似于雷氯必利,而伊沙匹隆的作用类似于8 - OH - DPAT。在该测试中,丁螺环酮似乎作为多巴胺拮抗剂起作用。药物的作用表明,SIP取决于动机和行为因素,这些因素可能比潜在的心理因素如焦虑或压力对药物操纵更敏感。