Jones B, Tan L T, Freestone G, Bleasdale C, Myint S, Littler J
Clatterbridge Centre for Oncology, Bebington, Wirral, Merseyside, UK.
Br J Radiol. 1994 Dec;67(804):1231-7. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-67-804-1231.
The ability to vary source dwell times in high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy allows for the use of non-uniform dwell times along a line source. This may have advantages in the radical treatment of tumours depending on individual tumour geometry. This study investigates the potential improvements in local tumour control relative to adjacent normal tissue isoeffects when intratumour source dwell times are increased along the central portion of a line source (technique A) in radiotherapy schedules which include a relatively small component of HDR brachytherapy. Such a technique is predicted to increase the local control for tumours of diameters ranging between 2 cm and 4 cm by up to 11% compared with a technique in which there are uniform dwell times along the line source (technique B). There is no difference in the local control rates for the two techniques when used to treat smaller tumours. Normal tissue doses are also modified by the technique used. Technique A produces higher normal tissue doses at points perpendicular to the centre of the line source and lower doses at points nearer the ends of the line source if the prescription point is not in the central plane of the line source. Alternatively, if the dose is prescribed at a point in the central plane of the line source, the dose at all the normal tissue points are lower when technique A is used.
在高剂量率(HDR)近距离放射治疗中改变源驻留时间的能力,使得沿直线源可以使用非均匀驻留时间。根据肿瘤的个体几何形状,这在肿瘤的根治性治疗中可能具有优势。本研究调查了在放射治疗方案中,当沿直线源的中心部分增加瘤内源驻留时间(技术A)时,相对于相邻正常组织等效应,局部肿瘤控制的潜在改善情况,该放射治疗方案包含相对较小比例的HDR近距离放射治疗。与沿直线源采用均匀驻留时间的技术(技术B)相比,预计这种技术可使直径在2厘米至4厘米之间的肿瘤的局部控制率提高多达11%。当用于治疗较小肿瘤时,两种技术的局部控制率没有差异。所使用的技术也会改变正常组织的剂量。如果处方点不在直线源的中心平面,技术A在垂直于直线源中心的点产生较高的正常组织剂量,而在靠近直线源末端的点产生较低的剂量。或者,如果在直线源的中心平面的某一点规定剂量,使用技术A时所有正常组织点的剂量都较低。