Talley J D, Wilkins C, Ciccone J, Hattel L J
Section of Invasive and Interventional Cardiology, University of Louisville School of Medicine, KY.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1994 Nov;33(3):205-11. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810330303.
A prospective randomized trial was performed to detect technical and clinical differences of 7F compared to 8F guiding catheters (GC) used in elective coronary angioplasty (PTCA). One hundred and fifteen patients undergoing elective PTCA with standard balloon dilatation catheters were randomized to 7F (55 pts) or 8F (58 pts) guiding catheters. The endpoints were primarily coronary artery and peripheral vascular complications; and secondarily, technical details and quantitative and qualitative angiographic quality. There was no difference between 7F or 8F GC for development of coronary or peripheral vascular complications. With 7F GC there was less blood loss (Hct, 3.5 +/- 3.4% vs. 6.5 +/- 9.6%, P = .033), and less contrast medium (160 +/- 88 mL vs. 200 +/- 119 mL, P = .049) used. Angiographic quality was similar, although visualization of lesions in the left anterior descending coronary artery in the left anterior oblique projection was improved with the 8F GC. There is no advantage of 7F GC for the prevention of coronary or peripheral vascular complications, although there was less blood loss and contrast medium used with the 7F systems.
进行了一项前瞻性随机试验,以检测在选择性冠状动脉血管成形术(PTCA)中使用的7F与8F引导导管(GC)的技术和临床差异。115例接受标准球囊扩张导管进行选择性PTCA的患者被随机分为7F组(55例)或8F组(58例)引导导管。主要终点是冠状动脉和外周血管并发症;次要终点是技术细节以及血管造影的定量和定性质量。7F或8F引导导管在冠状动脉或外周血管并发症的发生方面没有差异。使用7F引导导管时失血量较少(血细胞比容,3.5±3.4%对6.5±9.6%,P = 0.033),且使用的造影剂较少(160±88 mL对200±119 mL,P = 0.049)。血管造影质量相似,尽管在左前斜位投照下,8F引导导管改善了左前降支冠状动脉病变的可视化。7F引导导管在预防冠状动脉或外周血管并发症方面没有优势,尽管7F系统使用的失血量和造影剂较少。