Gerber M A, Shapiro E D, Bell G L, Sampieri A, Padula S J
Department of Pediatrics, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington.
J Infect Dis. 1995 Mar;171(3):724-7. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.3.724.
To compare the sensitivity of a new ELISA for IgM antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi that uses a recombinant outer surface protein C (rOspC) with those of a whole cell (WC) ELISA and an immunoblot assay for the diagnosis of early Lyme disease, serum specimens from 82 consecutive patients with physician-documented erythema migrans were analyzed. To compare the specificities of the three assays, serum specimens from 50 patients without a history of Lyme disease and from an area in which B. burgdorferi is not endemic were analyzed. The sensitivities of the WC ELISA, immunoblot assay, and IgM rOspC ELISA were 28%, 29%, and 46%, respectively, while the specificities were 100%, 100%, and 98%, respectively. The IgM rOspC ELISA is a convenient, readily automated, easily standardized serologic test that is significantly more sensitive for the diagnosis of early Lyme disease than either WC ELISA or immunoblot assay.
为比较一种使用重组外膜蛋白C(rOspC)的新型伯氏疏螺旋体IgM抗体酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)与全细胞(WC)ELISA及免疫印迹法在诊断早期莱姆病方面的敏感性,对82例经医生记录有游走性红斑的连续患者的血清标本进行了分析。为比较这三种检测方法的特异性,对50例无莱姆病病史且来自非伯氏疏螺旋体流行地区患者的血清标本进行了分析。WC ELISA、免疫印迹法和IgM rOspC ELISA的敏感性分别为28%、29%和46%,而特异性分别为100%、100%和98%。IgM rOspC ELISA是一种方便、易于自动化且易于标准化的血清学检测方法,在诊断早期莱姆病方面比WC ELISA或免疫印迹法显著更敏感。