• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理教师对任期后绩效评估的态度。

Attitudes of nurse-faculty toward post-tenure performance evaluations.

作者信息

Suess L R

机构信息

University of Connecticut School of Nursing.

出版信息

J Nurs Educ. 1995 Jan;34(1):25-30. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19950101-07.

DOI:10.3928/0148-4834-19950101-07
PMID:7876907
Abstract

While non-tenured faculty receive feedback on their work in their annual evaluations for reappointment, many tenured faculty do not receive evaluations and feedback except when seeking merit award or promotion. Recent literature suggests that feedback on work at fixed time intervals, through post-tenure evaluations, can positively enhance faculty productivity. This survey study examined the attitudes of faculty teaching in baccalaureate and higher degree programs in nursing toward post-tenure performance evaluations. A random, nationwide sample of 248 nurse-faculty participated in this study. Data analysis showed that attitude toward post-tenure evaluation was not significantly related to such variables as tenure status, perceived productivity in teaching, service, scholarship, internal motivation, age, teaching experience, sex, educational preparation, or rank. Faculty clearly stated that they desire feedback on their work, an opportunity to define future objectives, and a post-tenure evaluation system in their own schools.

摘要

虽然非终身教职员工在年度续聘评估中会收到关于其工作的反馈,但许多终身教职员工除非在寻求绩效奖励或晋升时,否则不会接受评估和反馈。最近的文献表明,通过任期后评估,定期对工作进行反馈可以积极提高教职员工的生产力。这项调查研究考察了护理学学士及更高学位项目中的教师对任期后绩效评估的态度。全国范围内随机抽取的248名护士教师参与了这项研究。数据分析表明,对任期后评估的态度与任期状态、教学、服务、学术方面的感知生产力、内部动机、年龄、教学经验、性别、教育背景或职级等变量没有显著关系。教师们明确表示,他们希望得到关于自己工作的反馈、确定未来目标的机会,以及所在学校的任期后评估体系。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of nurse-faculty toward post-tenure performance evaluations.护理教师对任期后绩效评估的态度。
J Nurs Educ. 1995 Jan;34(1):25-30. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19950101-07.
2
Academic Tenure: Perceptual Variations Among Tenured, Tenure-seeking and Non-tenure Faculty.学术终身教职:终身教职、寻求终身教职和非终身教职教师的感知差异。
J Prof Nurs. 2021 May-Jun;37(3):578-587. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
3
Correlates of university nurse faculty publication productivity.大学护理教师发表成果的相关因素。
J Nurs Educ. 1986 May;25(5):207-12. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19860501-08.
4
Tenure and promotion: an update on university nursing faculty.
J Nurs Educ. 1987 May;26(5):182-8. doi: 10.3928/0148-4834-19870501-04.
5
Academic tenure in schools of nursing.护理学院的终身教职
J Prof Nurs. 1989 Jan-Feb;5(1):39-48. doi: 10.1016/s8755-7223(89)80034-1.
6
Why do faculty members get tenure? The dean's perspective.
Nurse Educ. 1991 May-Jun;16(3):23-5. doi: 10.1097/00006223-199105000-00010.
7
Preparing nursing faculty for baccalaureate-level and graduate-level nursing programs: role preparation for the academy.为本科和研究生层次护理专业培养师资:学院角色培养
J Nurs Educ. 2007 Apr;46(4):154-8. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20070401-03.
8
Assessment of the Impact of Teaching Demands on Research Productivity Among Doctoral Nursing Program Faculty.评估教学要求对护理学博士项目教员研究生产力的影响。
J Prof Nurs. 2016 May-Jun;32(3):180-92. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2015.06.011. Epub 2015 Jun 24.
9
Student evaluations: advice for novice faculty.学生评价:给新手教师的建议
J Nurs Educ. 2008 Apr;47(4):187-9. doi: 10.3928/01484834-20080401-03.
10
The scholarship of teaching: implications for nursing faculty.教学学术:对护理教师的启示
J Prof Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;20(1):7-14. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2003.12.002.