Quintilio C, Voci P, Bilotta F, Luzi G, Chiarotti F, Acconcia M C, Mercanti C, Marino B
Department of Cardiac Surgery, University of Florence, Italy.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995 Mar;109(3):439-47. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70274-1.
Myocardial distribution of cardioplegic solution infused by combined antegrade/retrograde routes was assessed with myocardial contrast echocardiography in 18 patients with chronic stable angina and three-vessel disease undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting. Overall myocardial opacification was significantly greater in retrograde than in antegrade cardioplegia (77.7% +/- 13.4% versus 59.1% +/- 15.7%; p = 0.0009). The difference was affected by collateral circulation, as pointed out by the significant interaction between coronary collateral circulation and percent of myocardial opacification after antegrade and retrograde cardioplegia (p = 0.002). When we performed multiple comparisons, in patients with good collaterals the opacification difference between antegrade and retrograde cardioplegia was not statistically significant (66.4% +/- 10.2% versus 76.0% +/- 15.2%; p = not significant), whereas in patients with poor collaterals myocardial opacification during retrograde cardioplegia was significantly greater (44.3% +/- 15.0% versus 81.2% +/- 9.0%; p < 0.02). During antegrade cardioplegia, patients with poor collaterals showed a lower degree of myocardial opacification than patients with good collaterals (44.3% +/- 15.0% versus 66.4% +/- 10.2%; p < 0.01). Our results show that retrograde cardioplegia in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting offers no advantage over antegrade cardioplegia when collateral circulation is well developed. On the other hand, conventional aortic root infusion may not provide adequate myocardial protection in the subset of patients with significantly narrowed or occluded coronary arteries and poor collaterals.
在18例慢性稳定型心绞痛且三支血管病变并接受择期冠状动脉搭桥术的患者中,采用心肌对比超声心动图评估顺行/逆行联合灌注停搏液时心肌的分布情况。总体而言,逆行灌注停搏液时心肌显影明显优于顺行灌注(分别为77.7%±13.4%和59.1%±15.7%;p = 0.0009)。冠状动脉侧支循环与顺行和逆行灌注停搏液后心肌显影百分比之间存在显著交互作用(p = 0.002),提示该差异受侧支循环影响。进行多重比较时,侧支循环良好的患者顺行与逆行灌注停搏液时的显影差异无统计学意义(分别为66.4%±10.2%和76.0%±15.2%;p无统计学意义),而侧支循环不良的患者逆行灌注停搏液时心肌显影显著更优(分别为44.3%±15.0%和81.2%±9.0%;p < 0.02)。顺行灌注停搏液时,侧支循环不良的患者心肌显影程度低于侧支循环良好的患者(分别为44.3%±15.0%和66.4%±10.2%;p < 0.01)。我们的结果表明,对于侧支循环良好的择期冠状动脉搭桥术患者,逆行灌注停搏液并不比顺行灌注停搏液更具优势。另一方面,对于冠状动脉明显狭窄或闭塞且侧支循环不良的患者,传统的主动脉根部灌注可能无法提供足够的心肌保护。