European Parliament rejects bid to stem confusion over gene patents.
作者信息
Dickson D
出版信息
Nature. 1995 Mar 9;374(6518):103. doi: 10.1038/374103a0.
DOI:10.1038/374103a0
PMID:7877671
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
European Parliament rejects bid to stem confusion over gene patents.
Nature. 1995 Mar 9;374(6518):103. doi: 10.1038/374103a0.
2
Europe tries again on biotechnology patents.
Nature. 1995 Nov 23;378(6555):328. doi: 10.1038/378328a0.
3
Why the European Parliament rejected the patenting of human genes.欧洲议会为何拒绝授予人类基因专利。
Gene Ther. 1995 Oct;2(8):509-11.
4
European Parliament rejects move to restrict genetics.欧洲议会否决了限制遗传学的提议。
Nature. 2001 Dec 6;414(6864):572. doi: 10.1038/414572a.
5
Euro-vote lifts block on biotech patents...but parliament wants closer scrutiny.
Nature. 1997 Jul 24;388(6640):314-5. doi: 10.1038/40935.
6
Accord could lift block on European biotech patents.
Nature. 1997 Jun 26;387(6636):835. doi: 10.1038/43011.
7
Progress on patents, but more action is needed.
Nature. 1997 Jul 24;388(6640):309. doi: 10.1038/40918.
8
Europe's life patent moratorium may go..
Nature. 1998 May 21;393(6682):200. doi: 10.1038/30309.
9
European proposal reopens debate over patenting of human genes.欧洲的提议重新引发了关于人类基因专利问题的辩论。
Nature. 1995;378(6559):756. doi: 10.1038/378756a0.
10
European debate on biotech highlights policy differences.欧洲关于生物技术的辩论凸显了政策差异。
Nature. 1996 Jan 18;379(6562):197. doi: 10.1038/379197b0.
Zotero 插件