Han Z S
Department of Neurobiology, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi' an.
Sheng Li Xue Bao. 1994 Dec;46(6):581-5.
Using standard intracellular recording and staining techniques, 4 chandelier interneurons were sampled and anatomically confirmed from 39 physiologically identified interneurons in rat hippocampal slices. Compared to pyramidal and granule cells, all 4 chandelier interneurons-(CA1 region, n = 3, dentate gyrus, n = 1) had typical action potentials of interneurons, i. e., a shorter duration of action potential was followed by a deep after hyperpolarization. However, all these 4 cells exhibited a varying degree of spike frequency adaptation in response to depolarizing current injection, which usually do not occur in basket interneurons. Morphologically, axonal terminals of chandelier cells were beaded and exclusively distributed in the stratum oriens of the CA1 and the granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus, where the initial segments of pyramidal and granule cells are located. These results indicate that the chandelier interneurons differ from basket interneurons in the rat hippocampus with in physiology and in morphology.
运用标准的细胞内记录和染色技术,从大鼠海马切片中39个经生理学鉴定的中间神经元中选取并经解剖学确认了4个吊灯状中间神经元。与锥体细胞和颗粒细胞相比,所有4个吊灯状中间神经元(CA1区,n = 3;齿状回,n = 1)都具有中间神经元典型的动作电位,即动作电位持续时间较短,随后是深度超极化后电位。然而,这4个细胞在去极化电流注入时均表现出不同程度的放电频率适应,而篮状中间神经元通常不会出现这种情况。在形态学上,吊灯状细胞的轴突终末呈念珠状,且仅分布于CA1的海马下托层和齿状回的颗粒细胞层,即锥体细胞和颗粒细胞的起始段所在位置。这些结果表明,大鼠海马中的吊灯状中间神经元在生理和形态上与篮状中间神经元不同。