Suppr超能文献

血小板特异性同种异体抗原PlA1(HPA - 1a):瑞典献血人群中流式细胞术免疫表型分析与使用聚合酶链反应和限制性片段长度多态性进行基因分型的比较

The platelet-specific alloantigen PlA1 (HPA-1a): a comparison of flow cytometric immunophenotyping and genotyping using polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism in a Swedish blood donor population.

作者信息

Forsberg B, Jacobsson S, Stockelberg D, Kutti J, Rydberg L, Wadenvik H

机构信息

Institution for Biomedical Laboratory Science, Sahlgrenska Hospital, University of Göteborg, Sweden.

出版信息

Transfusion. 1995 Mar;35(3):241-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1995.35395184281.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is an increasing interest in the development of rapid and reliable techniques for platelet alloantigen typing.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

By use of standardized flow cytometry and a specific human alloantiserum, 236 Swedish blood donors were immunophenotyped for the platelet-specific alloantigen, PlA1 (HPA-1a).

RESULTS

Ten individuals (4.2%) had low fluorescence intensities and were considered PlA1-negative (HPA-1a-negative); all of them also demonstrated a PlA2/PlA2 (HPA-1b/1b) genotype in a polymerase chain reaction and restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) assay of the underlying DNA polymorphism. The remaining population had clear positive fluorescence and was regarded as PlA1-positive (HPA-1a-positive). The fluorescence distribution histogram among PlA1-positive (HPA-1a-positive) individuals was dome-shaped, and those individuals who were homozygous for PlA1 (HPA-1a) could not be distinguished from those who were heterozygous. This finding was further substantiated by PCR-RFLP analysis of the PlA1/PlA2 (HPA-1a/1b) genotype; a heterozygous genotype was found among those having a medium fluorescence intensity as well as among those having a strong fluorescence intensity.

CONCLUSION

Flow cytometry is a valuable tool for large-scale detection of PlA1 (HPA-1a). However, flow cytometry based on only one antiserum cannot distinguish between homozygous and heterozygous carriers of PlA1 (HPA-1a). For zygosity testing and when platelets are difficult to obtain, the PCR-RFLP technique is the assay of choice.

摘要

背景

人们对开发快速可靠的血小板同种抗原分型技术的兴趣与日俱增。

研究设计与方法

通过使用标准化流式细胞术和一种特异性人同种抗体血清,对236名瑞典献血者进行血小板特异性同种抗原PlA1(HPA-1a)的免疫表型分析。

结果

10名个体(4.2%)荧光强度较低,被认为是PlA1阴性(HPA-1a阴性);在对其潜在DNA多态性进行的聚合酶链反应和限制性片段长度多态性(PCR-RFLP)分析中,所有这些个体均显示为PlA2/PlA2(HPA-1b/1b)基因型。其余人群荧光明显呈阳性,被视为PlA1阳性(HPA-1a阳性)。PlA1阳性(HPA-1a阳性)个体的荧光分布直方图呈圆顶形,无法区分PlA1(HPA-1a)纯合子个体与杂合子个体。对PlA1/PlA2(HPA-1a/1b)基因型进行的PCR-RFLP分析进一步证实了这一发现;在中等荧光强度个体以及强荧光强度个体中均发现了杂合基因型。

结论

流式细胞术是大规模检测PlA1(HPA-1a)的有价值工具。然而,仅基于一种抗血清的流式细胞术无法区分PlA1(HPA-1a)的纯合子携带者和杂合子携带者。对于合子性检测以及难以获取血小板的情况,PCR-RFLP技术是首选检测方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验