Chen M, Beck W T
Department of Molecular Pharmacology, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38101.
Cancer Res. 1995 Apr 1;55(7):1509-16.
Merbarone, a novel DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) inhibitor, differs from teniposide (VM-26) in that it inhibits topo II activities without stabilizing topo II-DNA covalent complexes. Thus, while the cellular effects of VM-26 are the consequences of inhibition of topo II catalytic activities and generation of topo II-mediated DNA damage, those of merbarone may be due to inactivation of topo II catalytic function. To address the issues of mechanisms of cell cycle effects and pharmacological actions of these two topo II inhibitors in mammalian cells, we used synchronized cultures of HeLa cells to study the effects of these drugs on cell cycle processes where topo II is essential (e.g., chromosome separation) or possibly involved (e.g., G2 arrest, DNA replication). We found that both drugs inhibited chromosome separation and cell division without preventing cells from exiting mitosis. Both drugs caused S-phase retardation G2 arrest, and phase-specific cytotoxicity in that they are more toxic to S, M, and G2 cells than G0/G1 cells. However, merbarone produced the above effects in convergent dosages that were within one to five times its 90% inhibitory cytotoxic concentration, whereas the concentrations of VM-26 to cause quantitatively similar effects were quite divergent. VM-26 is 50-100-fold more efficient in causing G2 arrest than in inhibiting chromosome separation. Furthermore, at concentrations showing similar levels of S-phase suppression, VM-26 caused significant DNA breaks, while merbarone had no such effect. Our data suggest that the effects of merbarone and VM-26 during mitosis are most likely due to inhibition of topo II function. We conclude that while G2 arrest by VM-26 is related to topo II-mediated DNA damage and its sequelae, G2 arrest by merbarone likely results from different mechanisms.
美巴拉酮是一种新型的DNA拓扑异构酶II(拓扑II)抑制剂,它与替尼泊苷(VM - 26)的不同之处在于,它抑制拓扑II活性时不会使拓扑II - DNA共价复合物稳定。因此,虽然VM - 26的细胞效应是抑制拓扑II催化活性和产生拓扑II介导的DNA损伤的结果,但美巴拉酮的细胞效应可能是由于拓扑II催化功能失活。为了解决这两种拓扑II抑制剂在哺乳动物细胞中的细胞周期效应机制和药理作用问题,我们使用同步培养的HeLa细胞来研究这些药物对拓扑II必不可少的细胞周期过程(如染色体分离)或可能涉及的过程(如G2期阻滞、DNA复制)的影响。我们发现这两种药物都抑制染色体分离和细胞分裂,但不会阻止细胞退出有丝分裂。两种药物都导致S期延迟、G2期阻滞以及阶段特异性细胞毒性,即它们对S期、M期和G2期细胞的毒性比对G0/G1期细胞更大。然而,美巴拉酮在其90%抑制细胞毒性浓度的一到五倍范围内的收敛剂量下产生上述效应,而引起定量相似效应的VM - 26浓度则差异很大。VM - 26引起G2期阻滞的效率比抑制染色体分离高50 - 100倍。此外,在显示相似水平S期抑制的浓度下,VM - 26会导致显著的DNA断裂,而美巴拉酮没有这种作用。我们的数据表明,美巴拉酮和VM - 26在有丝分裂期间的效应很可能是由于抑制拓扑II功能。我们得出结论,虽然VM - 26引起的G2期阻滞与拓扑II介导的DNA损伤及其后遗症有关,但美巴拉酮引起的G2期阻滞可能是由不同机制导致的。