Suppr超能文献

[植入式自动除颤器患者的心律失常症状与事件]

[Arrhythmic symptoms and events in patients wearing an implantable automatic defibrillator].

作者信息

Auricchio A, Auricchio U, Scafuri A, Fratini S, Chiariello L

机构信息

Laboratorio di Elettrofisiologia, Università di Roma Tor Vergata, European Hospital.

出版信息

G Ital Cardiol. 1994 Dec;24(12):1567-73.

PMID:7883129
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although symptoms can be of some help in identifying the arrhythmia related to implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharge, symptomatic supraventricular arrhythmias and asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia have been reported.

METHODS

In 18 survivors of cardiac arrest implanted with an ICD, the symptoms and intracardiac electrograms were systematically evaluated, in order to better define a relationship between some symptoms and supraventricular or ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

RESULTS

A total number of 249 arrhythmic episodes were detected by the ICD during a mean follow-up of 378 +/- 107 days (range 137 to 642). Within this time, in 15 out of 18 patients (83%) at least one arrhythmic event alerting the device occurred, determining a therapeutic attempt in 13 patients. Only 49% of the episode stored by the ICD were symptomatic. Symptoms like palpitations, dizziness, "going under" lacked of predictability for ventricular tachycardia; in contrast, patients describing a "hot flush", alone or associated with palpitations, lightheadedness, dizziness most commonly recognized a ventricular tachyarrhythmias. This symptom had a good sensitivity (72%) and a high specificity (95%) in detecting a sustained ventricular tachycardia.

CONCLUSIONS

Since in most cases symptoms are not a reliable criterion for validating ICD discharges stored electrograms during ICD activation need to be considered for analysis. However, the data of this study showed the importance of "hot flush" as a key symptom for recognizing the occurrence of a sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia.

摘要

背景

尽管症状在识别与植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)放电相关的心律失常方面可能有所帮助,但已有症状性室上性心律失常和无症状性室性心动过速的报道。

方法

在18例植入ICD的心脏骤停幸存者中,系统评估了症状和心内电图,以更好地确定某些症状与室上性或室性快速性心律失常之间的关系。

结果

在平均378±107天(范围137至642天)的随访期间,ICD共检测到249次心律失常发作。在此期间,18例患者中有15例(83%)至少发生了一次触发该设备的心律失常事件,其中13例患者进行了治疗尝试。ICD记录的发作中只有49%有症状。心悸、头晕、“晕厥”等症状对室性心动过速缺乏预测性;相比之下,描述“潮热”,单独出现或伴有心悸、头晕、眩晕的患者最常被识别为室性快速性心律失常。这种症状在检测持续性室性心动过速方面具有良好的敏感性(72%)和高特异性(95%)。

结论

由于在大多数情况下,症状不是验证ICD放电的可靠标准,因此在分析时需要考虑ICD激活期间存储的电图。然而,本研究数据表明“潮热”作为识别持续性室性快速性心律失常发生的关键症状的重要性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验