Nallamothu N, Ghods M, Heo J, Iskandrian A S
Philadelphia Heart Institute, Presbyterian Medical Center, Pennsylvania 19104.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Mar 15;25(4):830-6. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00471-2.
This study compared the diagnostic accuracy of exercise thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with the exercise electrocardiographic (ECG) response in patients with normal baseline ECG results.
Previous studies comparing exercise thallium imaging with exercise electrocardiography have included patients with abnormal rest ECG results that may have biased the results in favor of thallium imaging.
Of 321 patients with a pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease of 70 +/- 29% (mean +/- SD) who underwent exercise stress testing and coronary angiography, 68 had no coronary artery disease; 94 had one-vessel disease; 79 had two-vessel disease; and 80 had three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.
The diagnostic accuracy of SPECT was higher than that of the ECG response (79% vs. 49%, p < 0.0001). Patients with extensive (left main or three-vessel) coronary artery disease were older and had a lower work load, lower heart rate, greater ST segment depression and more extensive perfusion abnormalities than patients with no disease or one- or two-vessel disease. Multivariate discriminant analysis of exercise and thallium variables identified multivessel thallium abnormalities (F = 35), exercise heart rate (F = 18) and extent of ST segment depression (F = 6) as independent predictors of extensive disease. Of the 80 patients with left main or three-vessel disease, 37 (46%) had > or = 2-mm ST segment depression, 44 (55%) had multivessel SPECT abnormalities, and 61 (76%) had either > or = 2-mm ST depression or multivessel SPECT abnormalities (p = 0.0005 vs. the ECG response; p = 0.01 vs. SPECT).
In patients with an intermediate to high pretest probability of coronary artery disease and normal baseline ECG results, SPECT is superior to the ECG response in detecting coronary disease. Further, SPECT provides incremental power in identifying patients with extensive (left main or three-vessel) coronary disease.
本研究比较了运动铊-201单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)与运动心电图(ECG)反应在基线心电图结果正常的患者中的诊断准确性。
既往比较运动铊显像与运动心电图的研究纳入了静息心电图结果异常的患者,这可能使结果偏向于铊显像。
在321例接受运动负荷试验和冠状动脉造影的患者中,冠状动脉疾病预测试验可能性为70±29%(均值±标准差),其中68例无冠状动脉疾病;94例有单支血管病变;79例有双支血管病变;80例有三支血管或左主干冠状动脉疾病。
SPECT的诊断准确性高于心电图反应(79%对49%,p<0.0001)。与无疾病或单支或双支血管疾病的患者相比,广泛(左主干或三支血管)冠状动脉疾病患者年龄更大,运动负荷更低,心率更低,ST段压低更明显,灌注异常更广泛。对运动和铊变量进行多变量判别分析,确定多支血管铊异常(F=35)、运动心率(F=18)和ST段压低程度(F=6)为广泛疾病的独立预测因素。在80例左主干或三支血管疾病患者中,37例(46%)ST段压低≥2mm,44例(55%)有多支血管SPECT异常,61例(76%)有ST段压低≥2mm或多支血管SPECT异常(与心电图反应相比,p=0.0005;与SPECT相比,p=0.01)。
在冠状动脉疾病预测试验概率为中至高且基线心电图结果正常的患者中,SPECT在检测冠状动脉疾病方面优于心电图反应。此外,SPECT在识别广泛(左主干或三支血管)冠状动脉疾病患者方面具有额外价值。