Bokhari S, Blood D K, Bergmann S R
Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2001 May-Jun;8(3):325-31. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2001.112855.
It has been reported that the use of right precordial leads results in the same diagnostic accuracy as thallium-201 exercise scintigraphy for the detection of coronary artery disease (CAD). The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of right precordial leads in the detection of CAD.
We evaluated 900 consecutive patients (514 men, 386 women) ranging in age from 39 to 84 years (mean +/- SD, 64 +/- 11 years). Seven hundred forty patients underwent treadmill exercise testing, and 160 underwent pharmacologic stress testing for the diagnosis of chest pain or dyspnea. All received either Tl-201 or technetium-99m sestamibi during stress. During stress testing, the ECG was recorded every minute with 12 limb and left precordial leads and 3 right precordial leads (V(3)R, V(4)R, and V(5)R). The electrocardiogram was considered positive when the ST segment was either elevated or depressed by at least 0.1 mV at 80 ms after the J point, and results were also compared with single photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging results. Of the 900 patients, 158 had significant positive changes in the limb or left precordial leads. Only 4 patients had positive changes in the right precordial leads (Fisher exact test, P <.001). Of the patients who had positive electrocardiographic changes, 95 (60%) had abnormal myocardial perfusion scans, with 91 in patients with normal right precordial leads. All 4 patients with ischemic changes in the right precordial leads had abnormal scans, but the left leads were also positive. Three hundred seventy-three of 900 patients (41%) had abnormal scans with no electrocardiographic evidence of ischemia.
Our experience is far different than that published and suggests that the use of right precordial leads during stress testing fails to provide the same diagnostic accuracy as either the standard left-sided electrocardiography or myocardial perfusion imaging for the detection of CAD.
据报道,使用右胸前导联在检测冠状动脉疾病(CAD)方面与铊 - 201运动闪烁扫描具有相同的诊断准确性。本研究的目的是评估右胸前导联在检测CAD中的效用。
我们评估了900例连续患者(514例男性,386例女性),年龄范围为39至84岁(平均±标准差,64±11岁)。740例患者接受了平板运动试验,160例患者接受了药物负荷试验以诊断胸痛或呼吸困难。所有患者在负荷期间均接受了铊 - 201或锝 - 99m甲氧基异丁基异腈。在负荷试验期间,每分钟记录一次心电图,包括12个肢体导联、左胸前导联以及3个右胸前导联(V(3)R、V(4)R和V(5)R)。当J点后80毫秒时ST段抬高或压低至少0.1 mV时,心电图被认为是阳性,并且结果还与单光子发射计算机断层扫描心肌灌注成像结果进行了比较。在900例患者中,158例在肢体或左胸前导联有显著阳性变化。只有4例患者在右胸前导联有阳性变化(Fisher精确检验,P <.001)。在心电图有阳性变化的患者中,95例(60%)心肌灌注扫描异常,其中91例患者右胸前导联正常。所有4例右胸前导联有缺血性变化的患者扫描均异常,但左导联也为阳性。900例患者中有373例(41%)扫描异常,但无心电图缺血证据。
我们的经验与已发表的结果大不相同,表明在负荷试验期间使用右胸前导联在检测CAD方面未能提供与标准左侧心电图或心肌灌注成像相同的诊断准确性。