Ran M, Yaakubowicz M, Talal N, Witz I P
Eur J Immunol. 1978 Jun;8(6):423-8. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830080610.
We have studied the ability of various antisera to induce resistance to complement-dependent lysis (CdL) (lysostripping) of surface antigens of B and T lymphoma cells. Alloantisera, xenoantisera, as well as anti-Rauscher-leukemia virus (RLV) antisera, were used. Whereas all antisera could induce resistance to CdL mediated by the same serum that served for lysostripping (autolysostrip), only some of the tested antisera could induce resistance to CdL by other antisera (co-lysostrip). In some combinations co-lysostrip was unidirectional, i.e., in a pair of antisera, one induced autolysostrip as well as co-lysostrip, whereas the other antiserum induced autolysostrip only. In other combinations co-lysostrip was reciprocal. These investigations do not support the possibility that viral components and alloantigenic determinants are associated on mouse lymphoma cells.
我们研究了各种抗血清诱导对B和T淋巴瘤细胞表面抗原补体依赖性裂解(CdL)(溶菌剥离)产生抗性的能力。使用了同种抗血清、异种抗血清以及抗劳斯氏白血病病毒(RLV)抗血清。虽然所有抗血清都能诱导对用于溶菌剥离的同一种血清介导的CdL产生抗性(自身溶菌剥离),但只有部分测试抗血清能诱导对其他抗血清介导的CdL产生抗性(协同溶菌剥离)。在某些组合中,协同溶菌剥离是单向的,即,在一对抗血清中,一种既能诱导自身溶菌剥离,也能诱导协同溶菌剥离,而另一种抗血清仅能诱导自身溶菌剥离。在其他组合中,协同溶菌剥离是相互的。这些研究不支持病毒成分和同种抗原决定簇在小鼠淋巴瘤细胞上相关联的可能性。