de Jonghe J F, Kat M G, Rottier W P, de Reus R
Psychiatrisch Centrum Vogelenzang, Bennebroek.
Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr. 1995 Feb;26(1):24-9.
Using a stepwise discriminant analysis we examined the Dutch observational ward behaviour scale GIP in relation to DSM-III-R classification. The GIP was compared to older rating-scales like the BOP and NOSIE-30 in a psychiatric observation clinic for the elderly. Nurses' observations based on the GIP are highly related to clinical diagnosis. Two hundred and ten patients with a dementia syndrome, other organic mental disorders, schizophrenia or mood disorders are correctly classified in 85.7% of the cases, compared to 74.3% and 72.8% with the BOP and NOSIE-30. GIP subscales were also significantly and exclusively correlated with severity of dementia and depression. However, the original GIP norms, based on observation in a chronic psychiatric population, are inadequate for the description of newly admitted elderly psychiatric patients.
我们运用逐步判别分析,研究了荷兰观察病房行为量表GIP与《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)分类之间的关系。在一家老年精神病观察诊所中,将GIP与诸如行为观察量表(BOP)和护士观察量表-30项(NOSIE-30)等旧的评定量表进行了比较。基于GIP的护士观察结果与临床诊断高度相关。210例患有痴呆综合征、其他器质性精神障碍、精神分裂症或情绪障碍的患者,采用GIP量表时,85.7%的病例能够正确分类,而采用BOP和NOSIE-30量表时,正确分类率分别为74.3%和72.8%。GIP分量表也与痴呆和抑郁的严重程度显著且唯一相关。然而,基于对慢性精神病患者群体观察得出的原始GIP常模,并不足以描述新入院的老年精神病患者。