• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[患者自控镇痛在术后疼痛治疗中的应用]

[Patient-controlled analgesia in treatment of postoperative pain].

作者信息

Lehmann K A

机构信息

Klinik für Anästhesiologie und operative Intensivmedizin, Universität zu Köln.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 1995;120(1):1-15.

PMID:7887033
Abstract

Patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) is a newer technique for pain management. Patients are allowed to self-administer small analgesic bolus doses, which have been preprogrammed by the physician, into a running intravenous infusion, intramuscularly, subcutaneously or even into the epidural space. Patients' demands are mostly controlled by computer-driven infusion pumps, but can also be delivered by simple disposable devices. Lockout times, concomitant infusions and hourly maximum doses can be set in most PCA pumps. Clinical experience with PCA demonstrates that individual variability in pain sensitivity and analgesic needs are of utmost importance. In contrast to earlier expectations, PCA opiate consumption is usually higher than with restrictive conventional dosing regimes, but without an increase of serious side effects. Such results let assume that many patients under conventional i.m. techniques must be considered to be underdosed. Patients acceptance is generally enthusiastic for self-control. It is suggested that PCA results should be used for the improvement of conventional techniques. PCA has also been found valuable for scientific pain studies, e.g. to determine predictors of postoperative pain, drug interactions and pharmacokinetic experiments. This review concentrates on intravenous PCA during the early postoperative period.

摘要

患者自控镇痛(PCA)是一种较新的疼痛管理技术。患者可以自行将医生预先设定好的小剂量镇痛推注药物,通过静脉持续输注、肌肉注射、皮下注射甚至硬膜外腔给药。患者的需求大多由计算机驱动的输液泵控制,但也可以通过简单的一次性装置给药。大多数PCA泵可以设置锁定时间、同时输注量和每小时最大剂量。PCA的临床经验表明,疼痛敏感性和镇痛需求的个体差异至关重要。与早期预期相反,PCA的阿片类药物消耗量通常高于限制性传统给药方案,但严重副作用并未增加。这些结果表明,许多接受传统肌肉注射技术治疗的患者可能剂量不足。患者对自我控制普遍持积极态度。建议将PCA的结果用于改进传统技术。PCA在科学疼痛研究中也很有价值,例如确定术后疼痛的预测因素、药物相互作用和药代动力学实验。本综述主要关注术后早期的静脉PCA。

相似文献

1
[Patient-controlled analgesia in treatment of postoperative pain].[患者自控镇痛在术后疼痛治疗中的应用]
Zentralbl Chir. 1995;120(1):1-15.
2
New developments in patient-controlled postoperative analgesia.
Ann Med. 1995 Apr;27(2):271-82. doi: 10.3109/07853899509031970.
3
[Postoperative analgesia with tramadol and metamizol. Continual infusion versus patient controlled analgesia].[曲马多与安乃近用于术后镇痛。持续输注与患者自控镇痛的比较]
Anaesthesist. 2003 Jan;52(1):33-41. doi: 10.1007/s00101-002-0427-1.
4
[Peri- and postoperative pain therapy with mechanical patient-controlled disposable analgesia pumps in general surgery. Report of initial trial].[普通外科中使用机械自控一次性镇痛泵进行围手术期疼痛治疗。初步试验报告]
Zentralbl Chir. 1996;121(7):552-6.
5
Patient-controlled analgesia with piritramid for the treatment of postoperative pain.
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 1986;37(4):247-57.
6
Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing patient-controlled intravenous analgesia with patient-controlled epidural analgesia after lumbar spinal fusion.腰椎融合术后患者自控静脉镇痛与患者自控硬膜外镇痛比较的前瞻性随机临床试验。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Apr 15;28(8):739-43.
7
[Efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia using a disposable PCA device].[使用一次性自控镇痛泵进行患者自控硬膜外镇痛的效果]
Masui. 2000 Aug;49(8):851-6.
8
Pediatric PCA: the role of concurrent opioid infusions and nurse-controlled analgesia.儿科患者自控镇痛:同时使用阿片类药物输注和护士控制镇痛的作用
Clin J Pain. 1993 Mar;9(1):26-33.
9
Epidural analgesia compared with intravenous analgesia after pediatric posterior spinal fusion.小儿后路脊柱融合术后硬膜外镇痛与静脉镇痛的比较。
J Pediatr Orthop. 2009 Sep;29(6):588-93. doi: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e3181b2ba08.
10
The efficacy of intravenous patient-controlled remifentanil versus morphine anesthesia after coronary artery surgery.冠状动脉搭桥术后静脉自控瑞芬太尼与吗啡麻醉的疗效比较
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2009 Apr;23(2):170-4. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2008.07.006. Epub 2008 Sep 24.

引用本文的文献

1
[Organization of pain therapy in surgery--comparison of acute pain service and alternative concepts].[外科疼痛治疗的组织——急性疼痛服务与其他概念的比较]
Chirurg. 2003 Sep;74(9):821-6. doi: 10.1007/s00104-003-0665-z.