Weldon B C, Connor M, White P F
Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Clin J Pain. 1993 Mar;9(1):26-33.
We designed a clinical study to determine: a) the safety and efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) therapy in children and adolescents undergoing major operations, b) if the use of a concurrent opioid infusion improved the efficacy of conventional PCA therapy, and c) if nurse control of the PCA device was a useful alternative in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting.
Subjects were randomly assigned to receive morphine sulfate for postoperative pain relief via intermittent PCA boluses on demand or PCA plus a continuous infusion (PCA + CI). Children (n = 12) who were unable to use the PCA device because of inadequate development level or upper extremity weakness were assigned to a nurse-controlled analgesia (NCA) group.
In the ICU of a university-based pediatric teaching hospital.
Fifty-four children and adolescents underwent elective scoliosis surgery.
The PCA devices were connected to the patient's i.v. catheter immediately after surgery. Morphine sulfate was administered on demand by either the patient or an ICU nurse for pain relief during the first 72 h after the operation.
Pain scores were recorded simultaneously by both the nurse and the patient using standardized visual analog scales. Opioid analgesic usage, side effects, and therapeutic interventions were recorded by the ICU nurse.
There were no differences between the PCA and PCA + CI groups with regard to morphine use, pain relief, side effects, or patient satisfaction. Nurses consistently underestimated their patient's level of pain, and children in the NCA groups received less morphine per kilogram than those who self-administered their own analgesic medication.
Both PCA and NCA were safe and efficient methods of analgesic administration in the pediatric ICU setting. However, use of a concurrent opioid infusion with PCA therapy did not provide any clinically significant advantages over intermittent bolus doses of the analgesic medication after scoliosis surgery. For patients unable to use a conventional PCA device, NCA is an acceptable alternative for the management of acute pain in the ICU setting.
我们设计了一项临床研究以确定:a)患者自控镇痛(PCA)疗法在接受大手术的儿童和青少年中的安全性和有效性;b)同时使用阿片类药物输注是否能提高传统PCA疗法的疗效;c)在重症监护病房(ICU)环境中,护士控制PCA设备是否是一种有用的替代方法。
受试者被随机分配,通过按需间歇性PCA推注或PCA加持续输注(PCA + CI)接受硫酸吗啡以缓解术后疼痛。因发育水平不足或上肢无力而无法使用PCA设备的儿童(n = 12)被分配到护士控制镇痛(NCA)组。
在一家大学附属儿科教学医院的ICU。
54名儿童和青少年接受了择期脊柱侧弯手术。
术后立即将PCA设备连接到患者的静脉导管。术后头72小时内,由患者或ICU护士按需给予硫酸吗啡以缓解疼痛。
护士和患者同时使用标准化视觉模拟量表记录疼痛评分。ICU护士记录阿片类镇痛药的使用情况、副作用和治疗干预措施。
PCA组和PCA + CI组在吗啡使用、疼痛缓解、副作用或患者满意度方面没有差异。护士一直低估患者的疼痛程度,NCA组的儿童每公斤体重接受的吗啡比自行服用镇痛药的儿童少。
在儿科ICU环境中,PCA和NCA都是安全有效的镇痛给药方法。然而,脊柱侧弯手术后,与间歇性推注镇痛药物相比,PCA疗法同时使用阿片类药物输注并没有提供任何临床上显著的优势。对于无法使用传统PCA设备的患者,NCA是ICU环境中管理急性疼痛的可接受替代方法。