Zuck T F, Riess J G
Hoxworth Blood Center, University of Cincinnati, Ohio.
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 1994;31(4):295-324. doi: 10.3109/10408369409084678.
In this review the current status of what commonly are termed "blood substitutes" is discussed. The term blood substitute is a misnomer because the formulations under development at this time transport respiratory gases but do not perform the metabolic, regulatory, and protective functions of blood. Either hemoglobin or a perfluorochemical form the base to transport oxygen; the advantages and disadvantages of each base are discussed. The availability of a blood substitute in the U.S. will require approval by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and, by law, both its efficacy and safety must be demonstrated prior to approval. Showing efficacy of any blood substitute is complicated by the oxygen reserve and the compensatory mechanisms to acute blood loss in man. The challenge is to prove that the administration of these formulations offer clinical advantages compared with replacement of volume alone. Several efficacy models, the most attractive among them being perioperative hemodilution, should provide data that would bring these formulations into clinical practice. When hemoglobin is not within the favorable environment of the red cell, whether the hemoglobin is derived from expression vectors developed through recombinant biotechnology or from lysed human red cells, it acquires a left-shifted oxygen disassociation curve. Further, because the tetramer disassociates when injected intravenously and the resulting dimers are cleared rapidly from the circulation by the kidneys, intravascular dwell time is brief. Hemoglobins have been modified chemically and linked intramolecularly, intermolecularly, and to macromolecules to correct these problems. While these manipulations have normalized the p50 and extended the dwell time significantly, some toxicity problems remain unresolved. The binding of nitric oxide to hemoglobin preparations and the presumably resultant systemic and pulmonary hypertension observed in animals may be the most difficult to overcome, although the implications of these reactions in man is poorly understood. Perfluorochemicals (PFC) provide a fundamentally different and simpler approach to oxygen transport than hemoglobin formulations. Typically, the PFCs used are liquids composed of 8 to 10 carbon atoms that dissolve oxygen and obey Henry's law. Thus, the recipient's inspired oxygen and cardiac output assume importance. Because they are insoluble in water, PFCs are administered as emulsions, that is, as small droplets about 0.1 to 0.2 microns in diameter. In this respect, they are very similar to the lipid emulsions widely used for parenteral nutrition. Egg yolk phospholipid and poloxamers are most commonly used as emulsifiers. PFCs are not metabolized and are excreted unchanged by the lungs, following temporary storage by the monocyte-macrophage system (MMS).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在这篇综述中,我们讨论了通常被称为“血液替代品”的当前状况。血液替代品这个术语是用词不当,因为目前正在研发的制剂只能运输呼吸气体,却无法履行血液的代谢、调节和保护功能。血红蛋白或全氟化合物构成了运输氧气的基础;文中讨论了每种基础的优缺点。在美国,血液替代品的上市需要获得食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的批准,而且根据法律规定,在批准之前必须证明其有效性和安全性。由于人体中的氧储备和急性失血的代偿机制,证明任何血液替代品的有效性都很复杂。挑战在于证明与单纯补充血容量相比,使用这些制剂能带来临床优势。几种有效性模型,其中最具吸引力的是围手术期血液稀释,应该能提供将这些制剂应用于临床实践的数据。当血红蛋白不在红细胞的有利环境中时,无论血红蛋白是源自通过重组生物技术开发的表达载体还是来自裂解的人类红细胞,它都会获得左移的氧解离曲线。此外,由于四聚体在静脉注射时会解离,产生的二聚体又会被肾脏迅速从循环中清除,所以血管内停留时间很短。人们已经对血红蛋白进行了化学修饰,并在分子内、分子间以及与大分子进行连接以纠正这些问题。虽然这些操作使p50正常化并显著延长了停留时间,但一些毒性问题仍未解决。一氧化氮与血红蛋白制剂的结合以及在动物身上观察到的可能由此导致的全身性和肺动脉高压可能是最难克服的问题,尽管这些反应对人类的影响还知之甚少。与血红蛋白制剂相比,全氟化合物(PFC)提供了一种根本不同且更简单的氧气运输方法。通常使用的全氟化合物是由8到10个碳原子组成的液体,它们能溶解氧气并遵循亨利定律。因此,受血者吸入的氧气和心输出量就显得很重要。由于它们不溶于水,全氟化合物以乳剂形式给药,即直径约为0.1至0.2微米的小液滴。在这方面,它们与广泛用于肠外营养的脂质乳剂非常相似。蛋黄磷脂和泊洛沙姆最常被用作乳化剂。全氟化合物不会被代谢,在被单核巨噬细胞系统(MMS)暂时储存后,会原封不动地通过肺部排出。(摘要截选至400字)