Crump B J, Panton R, Drummond M F, Marchment M, Hawkes R A
South Birmingham Health Authority.
BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):509-12. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.509.
General practitioners, especially fundholders, are becoming increasingly concerned about being asked to prescribe treatments for their patients that are outside their therapeutic experience. They are concerned about the clinical responsibility for such prescribing and the effects on their budgets. In some specialties transferring the costs of expensive treatments from secondary to primary care (cost shifting) has become partly institutionalised because of the separate sources of funding for drugs prescribed in the two sectors. With increased efforts to control the rising costs of the drugs budget and the emergence of new expensive treatments, cost shifting will be a challenge to clinicians and purchasers as they strive for rational, cost effective prescribing. A review of the funding mechanisms for drugs prescribing and of the relation between the licensing process and the decision to support the use of a treatment in primary or secondary care is needed.
全科医生,尤其是持有基金的医生,越来越担心被要求为患者开超出其治疗经验范围的治疗药物。他们担心这种开药行为的临床责任以及对其预算的影响。在某些专科领域,由于两个部门开药资金来源不同,将昂贵治疗的费用从二级医疗转移到初级医疗(成本转移)在一定程度上已制度化。随着控制药品预算成本上升的努力加大以及新的昂贵治疗方法的出现,成本转移将成为临床医生和采购方在努力实现合理、具有成本效益的开药过程中的一项挑战。需要对开药的资金机制以及许可程序与支持在初级或二级医疗中使用某种治疗方法的决策之间的关系进行审查。