初级医生招聘广告的内容：细节是否充分？
Content of advertisements for junior doctors: is there sufficient detail?
作者信息
Clark C L
机构信息
University Department of Surgery, Royal Free Hospital, London.
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Feb 25;310(6978):512-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6978.512.
OBJECTIVE
To determine whether employers follow BMA guidelines on advertisements when advertising for junior doctors.
DESIGN
Survey of advertisements for junior doctors in the BMJ's classified advertisements supplement from 12 March to 14 May 1994.
SUBJECTS
300 advertisements for substantive posts for junior doctors.
OUTCOME MEASURES
Compliance with BMA guidelines, compared by grade, specialty, and employer (trust or regional health authority); observation of any useful information not included in the guidelines.
RESULTS
Only eight advertisements included all the recommended information. Amount of information given was related to grade, specialty, or employer in only one respect: advertisements for basic trainees were more likely than those for higher specialist trainees to include information on pay and hours of work (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Advertisements for junior doctors in the BMJ do not comply with BMA guidelines and often contain little useful information for potential applicants.
目的
确定雇主在招聘初级医生时是否遵循英国医学协会（BMA）关于招聘广告的指南。
设计
对1994年3月12日至5月14日《英国医学杂志》（BMJ）分类广告增刊中初级医生招聘广告进行调查。
研究对象
300则初级医生实职岗位招聘广告。
观察指标
与BMA指南的符合情况，按级别、专业和雇主（信托机构或地区卫生局）进行比较；观察指南中未包含的任何有用信息。
结果
只有8则广告包含了所有推荐信息。所提供信息的数量仅在一个方面与级别、专业或雇主有关：基础培训医生的招聘广告比高级专科培训医生的招聘广告更有可能包含薪酬和工作时间信息（P<0.001）。
结论
《英国医学杂志》上初级医生的招聘广告不符合BMA指南，且通常为潜在求职者提供的有用信息很少。
Zotero 插件