Kiel J W, van Heuven W A
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio 78284.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Mar;36(3):579-85.
To compare choroidal blood pressure versus flow relationships obtained by three different methods of changing the ocular perfusion pressure.
Experiments were performed in pentobarbital-anesthetized rabbits with occluders on the aorta and inferior vena cava to control mean arterial pressure (MAP). The central ear artery was cannulated to measure MAP. Two 23-gauge needles were inserted through the pars plana into the vitreous: one connected to a saline-filled syringe to vary the ocular volume and the other to a pressure transducer to measure intraocular pressure (IOP). Choroidal perfusion was measured by laser-Doppler flowmetry with the probe in the vitreous over the posterior pole. In group 1 (n = 15), the MAP was varied while holding the IOP at 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 mm Hg. In group 2 (n = 19), the IOP was increased while holding the MAP at 80, 70, 60, 50, 40, 30 and 20 mm Hg. In group 3 (n = 21), the MAP was varied without controlling the IOP.
Group 1 baseline choroidal flows were similar at the five IOPs. When the flow was plotted against MAP, the curves diverged and extrapolated to intersect the pressure axis when the MAP equaled the set IOP. Group 2 baseline flows were similar at MAPs greater than 40 mm Hg. When the flow was plotted against the IOP, the curves diverged and intersected the pressure axis when the IOP equaled the MAP. In both groups, plotting the flow against the perfusion pressure (i.e., MAP minus IOP) collapsed the data points into single curves. Choroidal autoregulation occurred in all three groups; however, the low end of the autoregulatory perfusion pressure range was approximately 50 mm Hg in group 1, approximately 40 mm Hg in group 2, and approximately 30 mm Hg in group 3.
The results show that the effective choroidal perfusion pressure gradient equals the MAP minus the IOP, and that choroidal autoregulation is most effective when the MAP varies and IOP is not controlled.
比较通过三种不同改变眼灌注压方法所获得的脉络膜血压与血流的关系。
对戊巴比妥麻醉的兔子进行实验,在主动脉和下腔静脉放置阻塞器以控制平均动脉压(MAP)。将中耳动脉插管以测量MAP。两根23号针头经睫状体扁平部插入玻璃体:一根连接到装有生理盐水的注射器以改变眼内容积,另一根连接到压力传感器以测量眼压(IOP)。用激光多普勒血流仪在玻璃体中后极部的探头测量脉络膜灌注。在第1组(n = 15)中,在将IOP保持在10、15、20、25和30 mmHg的同时改变MAP。在第2组(n = 19)中,在将MAP保持在80、70、60、50、40、30和20 mmHg的同时升高IOP。在第3组(n = 21)中,改变MAP而不控制IOP。
第1组在五个IOP水平时的基线脉络膜血流相似。当将血流与MAP作图时,曲线发散,并且当MAP等于设定的IOP时外推至与压力轴相交。第2组在MAP大于40 mmHg时基线血流相似。当将血流与IOP作图时,曲线发散,并且当IOP等于MAP时与压力轴相交。在两组中,将血流与灌注压(即MAP减去IOP)作图时,数据点合并为单一曲线。所有三组均发生脉络膜自身调节;然而,自身调节灌注压范围的下限在第1组中约为50 mmHg,在第2组中约为40 mmHg,在第3组中约为30 mmHg。
结果表明,有效的脉络膜灌注压梯度等于MAP减去IOP,并且当MAP变化而不控制IOP时,脉络膜自身调节最有效。