Reinert S, Horn H, Bürrig K F
Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, Westdeutsche Kieferklinik, University of Düsseldorf, Germany.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994 Dec;23(6 Pt 2):434-6. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80040-2.
In an experimental study, a new mechanical device for microvascular anastomosis was compared with suture anastomosis. In 14 rabbits, seven end-to-end and seven end-to-side anastomoses of the jugular vein to interpositional vein grafts were done with a ring-pin device and by the conventional suture method. There was no significant difference between the patency rates of mechanical and suture anastomoses. The completion of mechanical anastomoses took one-third the time required for suture anastomoses. After 10 days, histologic and scanning electron microscopic examination revealed an uneventful reparative process at the anastomotic site with media atrophy and a continuous endothelial layer. At 4 weeks, occasional foreign body giant cells were seen between the polyethylene rings and surrounding connective tissue. The study confirms that the ring-pin device is safe and provides a faster way to do microvascular anastomoses than by suturing.
在一项实验研究中,将一种新型微血管吻合机械装置与缝合吻合术进行了比较。在14只兔子身上,用环形针装置和传统缝合方法对颈静脉与间置静脉移植物进行了7例端端吻合和7例端侧吻合。机械吻合和缝合吻合的通畅率之间没有显著差异。机械吻合完成所需时间仅为缝合吻合的三分之一。10天后,组织学和扫描电子显微镜检查显示吻合部位修复过程顺利,有中膜萎缩和连续的内皮细胞层。4周时,在聚乙烯环与周围结缔组织之间偶尔可见异物巨细胞。该研究证实,环形针装置是安全的,并且与缝合相比,提供了一种更快的微血管吻合方法。