• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[不同体型受试者群体的身体成分评估。皮褶厚度法与阻抗法的比较]

[Assessment of body composition in groups of subjects with different body size. Comparison of skinfold thickness and impedance methods].

作者信息

Buscemi S, Maneri R, Di Noto A, Verga S

机构信息

Cattedra di Clinica Medica B, Università degli Studi di Palermo.

出版信息

Ann Ital Med Int. 1994 Oct-Dec;9(4):223-7.

PMID:7893571
Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare plicometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis as methods for body composition assessment (fat mass-FM%, fat-free mass-FFM) and to extrapolate population-specific equations in order to predict the plicometrically-derived FM and FFM on the basis of body resistance. A cross-sectional study was carried out at the Diabetes Out-Patient Clinic, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Italy. We examined 102 subjects (45 men, 57 women, age range 30-45 years) divided into three groups: Group N (36 normal weight subjects, body mass index-BMI = weight/height2 = 24.5 +/- 0.8), Group O (35 obese subjects, BMI = 35.1 +/- 0.4), and Group GO (morbid obese subjects, BMI = 49.2 +/- 1.2) as well as a control group of 30 subjects (12 men, 18 women, age range 30-45 years, BMI = 20.9-63.1). We measured the following parameters: bioelectrical impedance analysis (body resistance: R), plicometry (triceps, biceps, subscapular, and suprailiac skinfolds), height (Ht), weight (W). The two methods were comparable in Groups N and O. In Group GO, however, especially in men and for FM%, measurements were significantly different. Plicometrically-determined FM% and FFM-Kg were significantly correlated to R.W/Ht2 (r = 0.821, p < 0.0001) and to Ht2/R (r = 0.867, p < 0.0001) respectively. The following prediction formulas for plicometric FM and FFM from body resistance and anthropometric variables were obtained: 1) FM% = 22.3 (R.W/Ht2)-2.2, and 2) FFM-Kg = 1.1 (Ht2/R)-3.1.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

我们研究的目的是比较褶厚度测量法和生物电阻抗分析这两种身体成分评估方法(脂肪量-FM%,去脂体重-FFM),并推断出特定人群的方程,以便根据身体电阻预测通过褶厚度测量法得出的FM和FFM。在意大利巴勒莫大学内科糖尿病门诊进行了一项横断面研究。我们检查了102名受试者(45名男性,57名女性,年龄范围30 - 45岁),分为三组:N组(36名体重正常受试者,体重指数-BMI = 体重/身高² = 24.5 ± 0.8),O组(35名肥胖受试者,BMI = 35.1 ± 0.4),以及GO组(病态肥胖受试者,BMI = 49.2 ± 1.2),还有一个由30名受试者组成的对照组(12名男性,18名女性,年龄范围30 - 45岁,BMI = 20.9 - 63.1)。我们测量了以下参数:生物电阻抗分析(身体电阻:R)、褶厚度测量法(肱三头肌、肱二头肌、肩胛下和髂上皮肤褶厚度)、身高(Ht)、体重(W)。在N组和O组中,这两种方法具有可比性。然而,在GO组中,尤其是男性和FM%方面,测量结果存在显著差异。通过褶厚度测量法确定的FM%和FFM - Kg分别与R·W/Ht²(r = 0.821,p < 0.0001)和Ht²/R(r = 0.867,p < 0.0001)显著相关。得出了以下根据身体电阻和人体测量变量预测褶厚度测量法得出的FM和FFM的公式:1)FM% = 22.3(R·W/Ht²)- 2.2,以及2)FFM - Kg = 1.1(Ht²/R)- 3.1。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
[Assessment of body composition in groups of subjects with different body size. Comparison of skinfold thickness and impedance methods].[不同体型受试者群体的身体成分评估。皮褶厚度法与阻抗法的比较]
Ann Ital Med Int. 1994 Oct-Dec;9(4):223-7.
2
Body composition analysis by leg-to-leg bioelectrical impedance and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in non-obese and obese individuals.非肥胖和肥胖个体中通过双腿生物电阻抗和双能X线吸收法进行身体成分分析
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2008 Nov;10(11):1012-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2008.00851.x. Epub 2008 Apr 22.
3
Estimation in community surveys of total body fat of children using bioelectrical impedance or skinfold thickness measurements.在社区调查中,使用生物电阻抗或皮褶厚度测量法估算儿童的全身脂肪。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1994 Mar;48(3):164-71.
4
Body mass index and bioelectrical vector distribution in 8-year-old children.8岁儿童的体重指数与生物电矢量分布
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2008 Feb;18(2):133-41. doi: 10.1016/j.numecd.2006.08.008. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
5
Relationships between plasma leptin levels and body composition parameters measured by different methods in postmenopausal women.绝经后女性血浆瘦素水平与通过不同方法测量的身体成分参数之间的关系。
Am J Hum Biol. 2003 Sep-Oct;15(5):628-36. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.10178.
6
Impedance index or standard anthropometric measurements, which is the better variable for predicting fat-free mass in sick children?阻抗指数或标准人体测量指标,哪一个是预测患病儿童去脂体重的更好变量?
Acta Paediatr. 2007 Jun;96(6):869-73. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00272.x.
7
Body composition assessment in adults with cystic fibrosis: comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry with skinfolds and bioelectrical impedance analysis.囊性纤维化成人患者的身体成分评估:双能X线吸收法与皮褶厚度测量法及生物电阻抗分析法的比较
Nutrition. 2005 Nov-Dec;21(11-12):1087-94. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2005.04.005. Epub 2005 Sep 23.
8
The influence of fat free mass on prediction of densitometric body composition by bioelectrical impedance analysis and by anthropometry.去脂体重对通过生物电阻抗分析和人体测量法预测密度测定身体成分的影响。
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996 Aug;50(8):542-8.
9
[Measurement of body fat with bioelectric impedance, skinfold thickness, and equations based on anthropometric measurements. Comparative analysis].[利用生物电阻抗、皮褶厚度以及基于人体测量学的公式测量体脂。比较分析]
Rev Esp Salud Publica. 2001 May-Jun;75(3):221-36.
10
Comparison of three bioelectrical impedance methods with DXA in overweight and obese men.超重和肥胖男性中三种生物电阻抗方法与双能X线吸收法的比较
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Nov;14(11):2064-70. doi: 10.1038/oby.2006.241.

引用本文的文献

1
Uremic sarcopenia: the role of intramuscular adipose tissue as a potential early identifier.尿毒症性肌肉减少症:肌肉内脂肪组织作为潜在早期识别指标的作用
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Nov 1;11:1372668. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1372668. eCollection 2024.