Shandas R, Gharib M, Sahn D J
Denver Children's Hospital, Colorado 80218-1088.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Apr;25(5):1199-212. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(94)00533-v.
This study investigated the proximal centerline flow convergence region simultaneously by both color Doppler and laser Doppler velocimetry.
Although numerous investigations have been performed to test the flow convergence method, to our knowledge there has yet been no experimental study using reference standard velocimetric techniques to define precisely the hydrodynamic factors involved in the accelerating flow region during steady and pulsatile flow.
Using an in vitro model that allows velocity measurements by laser Doppler velocimetry with simultaneous comparison with color Doppler results, we studied the centerline flow acceleration region proximal to orifices of various sizes (0.08 to 2.0 cm2).
Agreement between theory and experimental velocities was good for large flow rates through small orifices only, and only at distances > 1.2 cm from the orifice. Changing the orifice shape from circular to slitlike produced no significant changes in velocity profiles. Constraining the proximal side walls caused a significant increase in proximal velocities at distances > 0.7 cm for the largest orifice only (2.0 cm2). Calculated flow rates agreed well with actual flow rates, with functional dependence on proximal distance and orifice size. Velocity profiles for pulsatile flow were similar to steady state flow profiles and could be integrated to calculate stroke volumes, which followed actual flow volumes well, although with general overestimation (y = 1.22x + 0.164, r = 0.92), most likely due to the use of all available proximal velocities.
The accelerating proximal flow region responds to several hydrodynamic factors that can affect flow quantitation using the flow convergence method in the clinical situation.
本研究采用彩色多普勒和激光多普勒测速技术同时研究近端中心线血流会聚区。
尽管已经进行了大量研究来测试血流会聚方法,但据我们所知,尚无使用参考标准测速技术的实验研究来精确界定稳定流和脉动流期间加速血流区域中涉及的流体动力学因素。
使用一个体外模型,该模型允许通过激光多普勒测速技术进行速度测量,并同时与彩色多普勒结果进行比较,我们研究了各种尺寸(0.08至2.0平方厘米)孔口近端的中心线血流加速区域。
仅在通过小孔口的大流量情况下,且仅在距孔口>1.2厘米的距离处,理论速度与实验速度之间的一致性良好。将孔口形状从圆形变为狭缝状不会使速度分布产生显著变化。仅对最大孔口(2.0平方厘米)而言,限制近端侧壁会导致在距离>0.7厘米处近端速度显著增加。计算得到的流量与实际流量吻合良好,且与近端距离和孔口大小存在函数关系。脉动流的速度分布与稳态流分布相似,并且可以进行积分以计算搏出量,其与实际流量吻合良好,尽管通常存在高估(y = 1.22x + 0.164,r = 0.92),这很可能是由于使用了所有可用的近端速度。
近端血流加速区域对多种流体动力学因素有反应,这些因素在临床情况下可能会影响使用血流会聚方法进行的流量定量。