Thyagarajan D, Cascino T, Harms G
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905.
Neurology. 1995 Mar;45(3 Pt 1):421-7. doi: 10.1212/wnl.45.3.421.
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all patients with cancer and brachial plexopathy who had an MRI of the brachial plexus between 1984 and 1993 (71 patients). The MRIs were reevaluated in a blinded fashion. The presence of a mass adjacent to the brachial plexus on MRI was highly predictive of tumor infiltration as determined by clinicopathologic criteria and was the most useful feature in distinguishing radiation plexopathy from tumor infiltration. Increased T2 signal in or near the brachial plexus was commonly seen in both groups and was not useful in this distinction. MRI was very sensitive for brachial plexus abnormalities in this condition, and limited comparison with CT suggested that MRI is superior to CT as an imaging modality. CT performed sufficiently well, however, to suggest that a prospective comparison study of the cost effectiveness and clinical utility of the two imaging modalities in this clinical setting is warranted.
我们回顾性分析了1984年至1993年间所有患有癌症和臂丛神经病变且接受过臂丛神经MRI检查的患者(共71例)的临床记录。对MRI进行了盲法重新评估。根据临床病理标准,MRI显示臂丛神经旁有肿块高度提示肿瘤浸润,这是区分放射性臂丛神经病变与肿瘤浸润最有用的特征。两组中臂丛神经内或其附近T2信号增强均常见,在这种区分中并无帮助。在这种情况下,MRI对臂丛神经异常非常敏感,与CT的有限比较表明,作为一种成像方式,MRI优于CT。然而,CT表现也足够好,提示有必要对这两种成像方式在该临床环境中的成本效益和临床实用性进行前瞻性比较研究。