Ransil B J, Schachter S C
Charles A. Dana Research Institute, Boston, MA.
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Dec;79(3 Pt 1):1355-72. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.3.1355.
Test-retest reliability of the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory and of self-reported Global Handedness (left, right, ambidextrous), administered 18 mo. apart, was evaluated for 735 adult subjects. Conventional methods for evaluating test-retest reliability were compared with cross-tabulation and the kappa statistic, using as criteria both the degree of agreement and the degree and direction of disagreement. Inventory-derived laterality scores were correlated with Global Handedness responses, yielding a characteristic distribution of laterality scores for each global response which permitted the partitioning of the J-shaped frequency distribution plot of laterality scores into right, left, and ambidextrous regions. Test-retest reliability of the correlation between global responses and laterality scores on retest was demonstrated.
对735名成年受试者进行了爱丁堡利手量表及自我报告的整体利手情况(左利、右利、双手并用)的重测信度评估,两次测试间隔18个月。将评估重测信度的传统方法与交叉制表法及kappa统计量进行了比较,以一致性程度以及不一致的程度和方向作为标准。从量表得出的利手性得分与整体利手情况的回答相关,得出了每种整体回答对应的利手性得分的特征分布,这使得利手性得分的J形频率分布图能够被划分为右利、左利和双手并用区域。证明了复测时整体回答与利手性得分之间相关性的重测信度。