Wenderoth P, Alais D, Burke D, van der Zwan R
Department of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia.
Perception. 1994;23(10):1163-9. doi: 10.1068/p231163.
Motion aftereffects (MAEs) can be induced by adaptation to a pair of differently oriented drifting gratings whether the gratings are presented simultaneously, as a coherent plaid, or in alternation. The fact that the former MAEs were generally larger than the latter led to the suggestion that simultaneous adaptation involved higher-level extrastriate processes not involved in the alternating effects. In the past few years evidence has accumulated that the difference is in fact due to a low-level monocular process which can be termed the 'blob-tracking mechanism'. A review is presented of the evidence on MAEs induced by simultaneous and alternating adaptation, the evidence for the monocularity of the blob-tracking mechanism, the data which implicate the blob mechanism in the determination of MAE magnitude, perceived plaid drift direction, and in perceived plaid coherence.
运动后效(MAEs)可以通过适应一对方向不同的漂移光栅来诱发,无论这些光栅是同时呈现,形成一个连贯的格子图案,还是交替呈现。前一种运动后效通常比后一种大,这一事实表明,同时适应涉及到更高级别的纹外过程,而交替适应则不涉及这些过程。在过去几年中,越来越多的证据表明,这种差异实际上是由于一种低级别的单眼过程造成的,这种过程可以被称为“斑点跟踪机制”。本文综述了关于同时适应和交替适应诱发的运动后效的证据、斑点跟踪机制单眼性的证据、以及表明斑点机制在确定运动后效大小、感知格子图案漂移方向和感知格子图案连贯性方面起作用的数据。