Dijkstra T M, Cornilleau-Pérès V, Gielen C C, Droulez J
Laboratory of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(4):453-62. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00147-e.
We compare the performance in the detection of the shape of concave, planar and convex surfaces for small-field (8 deg) and large-field (90 deg) stimuli. Shape is perceived from head translations, object translations and object rotations. We find large differences between small-field and large-field stimulation. For small-field stimulation performance is best for object rotation, intermediate for self-motion and worst for object translation. For large-field stimulation performance is similar across conditions. Few errors on the sign of the curvature are found for self-motion for both field sizes, indicating that self-motion information disambiguates the curvature sign. For object rotation with small-field stimulation, the concave-convex ambiguity is strong with many apparent deformations. In contrast, large-field curvature signs are always accurately reported, suggesting that the weight of the rigidity hypothesis depends on field size.
我们比较了小视野(8度)和大视野(90度)刺激下,凹面、平面和凸面形状检测的性能。形状是通过头部平移、物体平移和物体旋转来感知的。我们发现小视野和大视野刺激之间存在很大差异。对于小视野刺激,物体旋转的性能最佳,自我运动的性能中等,物体平移的性能最差。对于大视野刺激,不同条件下的性能相似。对于两种视野大小的自我运动,曲率符号的错误很少,这表明自我运动信息消除了曲率符号的歧义。对于小视野刺激下的物体旋转,凹凸歧义很强,有许多明显的变形。相比之下,大视野曲率符号总是能被准确报告,这表明刚性假设的权重取决于视野大小。