Janeway C A, Bottomly K
Section of Immunobiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut 06510.
Cell. 1994 Jan 28;76(2):275-85. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90335-2.
The adaptive immune response protects us from infection in a world of pathogens that is forever evolving new variants. As the system is built on the generation of an open repertoire of receptors, the recognition of self is unavoidable, and is guarded against by deletion during lymphocyte development of those cells that are specific for ubiquitous self antigens, and the silencing of those that are specific for self antigens only encountered after cells achieve functional maturity in the periphery. This silencing occurs when lymphocytes recognize antigens in the absence of suitable costimulatory molecules. By contrast, when the same cell encounters the same ligand on a cell that expresses costimulatory molecules, it will proliferate and differentiate into an effector cell. These effector cells mediate protective immunity when the antigen is carried by a pathogen, but they can mount autoimmune responses if the antigen is derived from self. The major costimulatory molecules for CD4 T cells appear to be B7 and B7.2 that bind to the CD28 and CTLA-4 receptors on the T cell. The signals from the TCR appear to be integrated with those from the costimulator receptor, and the T cell response depends on the precise nature of these signals, further conditioned by cytokines present in the environment of the responding cell. B cells can be viewed in a similar way, with the costimulatory molecule CD40 ligand and cytokines coming mainly from CD4 helper T cells determining the fate of the responding B cell. The TCR is not simply an on and off switch, since the precise way in which the TCR is ligated determines the differentiation of the T cell and can alter the effector responses of established T cell lines. Thus, the response capabilities of T cells are more flexible than originally believed, and much of this flexibility comes from the interplay of TCR signals and signs from the environment. If the biochemical nature of these differential signaling pathways were known, it might be possible to develop simple pharmacological agents capable of diverting T cell responses from harmful to innocuous by getting the T cell to reinterpret the signals it is receiving via its receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
在一个病原体不断演化出新变种的世界里,适应性免疫反应保护我们免受感染。由于该系统建立在产生开放的受体库基础上,对自身的识别是不可避免的,在淋巴细胞发育过程中,针对普遍存在的自身抗原具有特异性的细胞会通过删除来防范,而针对仅在细胞在外周达到功能成熟后才遇到的自身抗原具有特异性的细胞则会被沉默。这种沉默发生在淋巴细胞在缺乏合适共刺激分子的情况下识别抗原时。相比之下,当同一个细胞在表达共刺激分子的细胞上遇到相同配体时,它会增殖并分化为效应细胞。当抗原由病原体携带时,这些效应细胞介导保护性免疫,但如果抗原来自自身,它们可能引发自身免疫反应。CD4 T细胞的主要共刺激分子似乎是与T细胞上的CD28和CTLA-4受体结合的B7和B7.2。来自TCR的信号似乎与来自共刺激受体的信号整合在一起,T细胞反应取决于这些信号的精确性质,进一步受到反应细胞环境中存在的细胞因子的调节。B细胞也可以以类似的方式看待,共刺激分子CD40配体和主要来自CD4辅助性T细胞的细胞因子决定反应性B细胞的命运。TCR不仅仅是一个开关,因为TCR被连接的精确方式决定了T细胞的分化,并可以改变已建立的T细胞系的效应反应。因此,T细胞的反应能力比最初认为的更灵活,这种灵活性很大程度上来自TCR信号与来自环境的信号之间的相互作用。如果这些差异信号通路的生化性质已知,那么有可能开发出简单的药物制剂,通过让T细胞重新解释其通过受体接收的信号,将T细胞反应从有害转向无害。(摘要截取自400字)