Suppr超能文献

天使综合征的分子机制:93例患者的调查

Molecular mechanisms in Angelman syndrome: a survey of 93 patients.

作者信息

Chan C T, Clayton-Smith J, Cheng X J, Buxton J, Webb T, Pembrey M E, Malcolm S

机构信息

Unit of Molecular Genetics, Institute of Child Health, London, UK.

出版信息

J Med Genet. 1993 Nov;30(11):895-902. doi: 10.1136/jmg.30.11.895.

Abstract

Angelman syndrome (AS) results from a lack of maternal contribution from chromosome 15q11-13, arising from de novo deletion in most cases or rarely from uniparental disomy. These families are associated with a low recurrence risk. However, in a minority of families, more than one child is affected. No deletion has been found in these families, except one. The mode of inheritance in these families is autosomal dominant modified by imprinting. Sporadic cases, with no observable deletion, therefore pose a counselling dilemma as there could be a recurrence risk as high as 50%. We present a series of 93 AS patients, showing the relative contribution of these different genetic mechanisms. Eighty-one AS patients were sporadic cases while 12 cases came from six families. Sixty cases had deletions in 15q11-13 detected by a set of highly polymorphic (CA)n repeats markers and conventional RFLPs. Ten sporadic cases plus all 12 familial cases had no detectable deletion. In addition, two cases of de novo deletions occurred in a chromosome 15 carrying a pericentric inversion. In one of these the AS child had a cousin with Prader-Willi syndrome (PWS) arising from a de novo deletion in an inv(15) inherited from his father. One case arose from a maternal balanced t(9;15)(p24;q15) translocation. There were three cases of uniparental disomy. Five patients were monoallelic for all loci across the minimal AS critical region, but the presence of a deletion cannot be confirmed. In familial cases, all affected sibs inherited the same maternal chromosome 15 markers for the region 15q11-13. Two cases were observed with a de novo deletion starting close to the locus D15S11 (IR4-2R), providing evidence for the development of classical AS with smaller deletions. Cytogenetic analysis proved limited in its ability to detect deletions, detecting only 42 out of 60 cases. However, cytogenetic analysis is still essential to detect chromosomal abnormalities other than deletions such as inversions and balanced translocations since both have an increased risk for deletions. A staged diagnostic strategy based on the use of highly informative (CA)n repeat markers is proposed.

摘要

安吉尔曼综合征(AS)是由于15号染色体长臂11-13区缺乏母源基因贡献所致,多数情况下源于新发缺失,极少数情况下源于单亲二体。这些家庭的复发风险较低。然而,少数家庭中有不止一个孩子患病。除了一个家庭外,这些家庭均未发现缺失。这些家庭的遗传方式为经印记修饰的常染色体显性遗传。散发病例未观察到缺失,因此在咨询时会面临两难境地,因为复发风险可能高达50%。我们报告了93例AS患者,展示了这些不同遗传机制的相对作用。81例为散发病例,12例来自6个家庭。60例通过一组高度多态性的(CA)n重复标记和传统限制性片段长度多态性(RFLP)检测到15q11-13缺失。10例散发病例加上所有12例家族性病例未检测到缺失。此外,在一条携带臂间倒位的15号染色体上发生了2例新发缺失。其中1例AS患儿的表兄患有普拉德-威利综合征(PWS),源于从父亲遗传的inv(15)中的新发缺失。1例源于母亲的平衡易位t(9;15)(p24;q15)。有3例单亲二体。5例患者在最小AS关键区域的所有位点均为单等位基因,但无法确定是否存在缺失。在家族性病例中,所有患病同胞在15q11-13区域均继承了相同的母源15号染色体标记。观察到2例新发缺失起始于靠近D15S11(IR4-2R)位点,为较小缺失导致典型AS的发生提供了证据。细胞遗传学分析检测缺失的能力有限,60例中仅检测到42例。然而,细胞遗传学分析对于检测除缺失以外的染色体异常(如倒位和平衡易位)仍然至关重要,因为这两种情况发生缺失的风险均增加。提出了一种基于使用高信息量(CA)n重复标记的分阶段诊断策略。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/89df/1016595/ac25b326d066/jmedgene00013-0013-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验