Chabre O, Conklin B R, Brandon S, Bourne H R, Limbird L E
Department of Pharmacology, University of California, San Francisco 94143.
J Biol Chem. 1994 Feb 25;269(8):5730-4.
It is now widely appreciated that G-protein-coupled cell-surface receptors can modulate distinct signal transduction pathways via coupling to different GTP-binding proteins. In the present study, we have used a transient co-expression approach to study the coupling of a single alpha 2-adrenergic receptor (alpha 2AAR) population to three different G protein subtypes (Gi, Gq, and Gs) acting on two different cellular effectors in HEK 293 cells. In all cases, the affinity of the receptor for the alpha 2A-adrenergic agonist, UK14304, is unchanged (KD approximately equal to 670 nM). However, there is a dramatic difference in the EC50 of UK14304 in eliciting inhibition of endogenous adenylyl cyclase via endogenous Gi (0.09 nM) versus activation of phospholipase C via co-transfected Gq (50 nM) or stimulation of endogenous adenylyl cyclase via co-transfected Gs (70 nM) in HEK 293 cells. These findings are consistent with the interpretations that the alpha 2AAR preferentially interacts with Gi rather than Gs or Gq. When the alpha 2AAR was mutated at Asp79, a residue highly conserved among G-protein-coupled receptors, the mutant D79N alpha 2AAR lost the ability to couple to Gq and Gs and, although it was able to couple to inhibition of cyclase via pertussis toxin-sensitive pathways (Gi), it did so with a lower potency than observed for the wild-type alpha 2AAR (EC50 = 7.2 nM). The most straightforward interpretation of these data is that the D79N mutation in the alpha 2AAR reduces the efficiency of coupling of the alpha 2AAR to all G-proteins, thus eliminating signal transduction through those pathways less efficiently coupled to the alpha 2AAR. Since the transient expression assays described permit manipulation of the structure of both the receptor or the G-protein, the present strategies could be exploited to delineate the complementary domains specifying the affinity and/or efficacy of receptor coupling to distinct GTP-binding proteins.
现在人们普遍认识到,G蛋白偶联的细胞表面受体可通过与不同的GTP结合蛋白偶联来调节不同的信号转导途径。在本研究中,我们采用瞬时共表达方法,研究了单个α2 -肾上腺素能受体(α2AAR)群体与三种不同的G蛋白亚型(Gi、Gq和Gs)的偶联情况,这些G蛋白亚型作用于HEK 293细胞中的两种不同细胞效应器。在所有情况下,受体对α2A -肾上腺素能激动剂UK14304的亲和力保持不变(KD约等于670 nM)。然而,在HEK 293细胞中,UK14304通过内源性Gi抑制内源性腺苷酸环化酶的EC50(0.09 nM),与通过共转染的Gq激活磷脂酶C的EC50(50 nM)或通过共转染的Gs刺激内源性腺苷酸环化酶的EC50(70 nM)之间存在显著差异。这些发现与α2AAR优先与Gi而非Gs或Gq相互作用的解释一致。当α2AAR在Asp79处发生突变时(Asp79是G蛋白偶联受体中高度保守的一个残基),突变体D79N α2AAR失去了与Gq和Gs偶联的能力,尽管它能够通过百日咳毒素敏感途径(Gi)偶联来抑制环化酶,但与野生型α2AAR相比,其效力较低(EC50 = 7.2 nM)。对这些数据最直接的解释是,α2AAR中的D79N突变降低了α2AAR与所有G蛋白偶联的效率,从而消除了通过那些与α2AAR偶联效率较低的途径进行的信号转导。由于所描述的瞬时表达测定允许对受体或G蛋白的结构进行操作,因此可以利用目前的策略来描绘指定受体与不同GTP结合蛋白偶联的亲和力和/或效力的互补结构域。