• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者选择:在紧急情况下决定使用精神药物还是身体约束措施。

Patient choice: deciding between psychotropic medication and physical restraints in an emergency.

作者信息

Sheline Y, Nelson T

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110.

出版信息

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(3):321-9.

PMID:7908543
Abstract

The legal requirement to use least restrictive interventions in emergency psychiatric treatment does not stipulate whether physical restraints or medication is least restrictive. There is no current consensus about how to determine least restrictive interventions in a generalizable manner. In this study patients who were clients in a public psychiatric emergency service were anonymously surveyed and asked to state their preferences for specific interventions in a psychiatric emergency. In a choice between physical restraints versus psychotropic medication, 64 percent of clients preferred medication; 36 percent preferred seclusion or restraint. The rank order of preferred modality was 1) benzodiazepines--31 percent, 2) neuroleptics--26 percent, 3) seclusion--24 percent, 4) restraints--10 percent. The rank order of last choice was different. Patients preference is an important factor in determining the appropriate intervention in an emergency. Patient participation offers an opportunity reconcile to clinical and legal objectives, to i improve compliance, and to enhance patient and staff safety.

摘要

在紧急精神科治疗中使用限制最小的干预措施的法律要求并未规定身体约束或药物治疗哪种限制最小。目前对于如何以可推广的方式确定限制最小的干预措施尚无共识。在本研究中,对一家公共精神科急诊服务机构的患者进行了匿名调查,询问他们在精神科急诊中对特定干预措施的偏好。在身体约束与精神药物之间进行选择时,64%的患者更喜欢药物治疗;36%的患者更喜欢隔离或约束。首选方式的排序为:1)苯二氮卓类药物——31%,2)抗精神病药物——26%,3)隔离——24%,4)约束——10%。最不喜欢的选择排序则不同。患者的偏好是决定紧急情况下适当干预措施的一个重要因素。患者参与为协调临床和法律目标、提高依从性以及增强患者和工作人员安全提供了机会。

相似文献

1
Patient choice: deciding between psychotropic medication and physical restraints in an emergency.患者选择:在紧急情况下决定使用精神药物还是身体约束措施。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1993;21(3):321-9.
2
The Expert Consensus Guideline Series. Treatment of behavioral emergencies.专家共识指南系列。行为紧急情况的治疗。
Postgrad Med. 2001 May(Spec No):1-88; quiz 89-90.
3
Beyond emergencies: the use of physical restraints in medical and psychiatric settings.超越紧急情况:医疗和精神科环境中身体约束的使用。
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;18(6):353-8. doi: 10.3109/10673229.2010.527514.
4
Emergency management of agitation in schizophrenia.精神分裂症激越的应急处理
Am J Emerg Med. 2005 Oct;23(6):767-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.02.050.
5
Using antipsychotic agents in older patients.在老年患者中使用抗精神病药物。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2004;65 Suppl 2:5-99; discussion 100-102; quiz 103-4.
6
The expert consensus guideline series. Optimizing pharmacologic treatment of psychotic disorders. Introduction: methods, commentary, and summary.专家共识指南系列。优化精神障碍的药物治疗。引言:方法、评论与总结。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2003;64 Suppl 12:5-19.
7
Psychotropic drugs: a constitutional right to informed consent.精神药物:知情同意的宪法权利。
Trial. 1980 Mar;16(3):15-7.
8
United States v. Leatherman: the legality of the administration of psychotropic drugs.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1985 Spring;1(1):207-14.
9
Factors associated with the use of physical restraints for agitated patients in psychiatric emergency rooms.精神科急诊室中与对躁动患者使用身体约束相关的因素。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 May-Jun;30(3):263-8. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2007.12.005.
10
Staff opinions about seclusion and restraint at a state forensic hospital.一家州立法医医院工作人员对隔离与约束措施的看法。
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994 Feb;45(2):138-41. doi: 10.1176/ps.45.2.138.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors associated with the use of seclusion in an inpatient psychiatric unit in Lilongwe, Malawi.马拉维利隆圭一家住院精神科病房中与使用隔离相关的因素。
Malawi Med J. 2018 Sep;30(3):197-204. doi: 10.4314/mmj.v30i3.12.
2
Patients' preference and experiences of forced medication and seclusion.患者对强制服药和隔离的偏好和体验。
Psychiatr Q. 2012 Mar;83(1):1-13. doi: 10.1007/s11126-011-9178-y.
3
First-episode schizophrenia: a focus on pharmacological treatment and safety considerations.首发精神分裂症:聚焦于药物治疗及安全性考量
Drugs. 2005;65(8):1113-38. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565080-00006.
4
Pharmacological treatment of psychotic agitation.精神病性激越的药物治疗。
CNS Drugs. 2002;16(4):219-28. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200216040-00002.
5
Bioethics for clinicians: 4. Voluntariness.临床医生的生物伦理学:4. 自愿性。
CMAJ. 1996 Oct 15;155(8):1083-6.