Imperato A, Obinu M C, Dazzi L, Gessa G L
Bernard B. Brodie' Department of Neuroscience, University of Cagliari, Italy.
Eur J Pharmacol. 1994 Jan 14;251(2-3):271-9. doi: 10.1016/0014-2999(94)90409-x.
The role of dopamine transmission on striatal acetylcholine release was investigated by using brain microdialysis. Blockade of dopamine D2 receptors with (-)-sulpiride or haloperidol increased acetylcholine release to a maximum of 80% (after 50 and 0.5 mg/kg, respectively). This effect was prevented by blockade of dopamine D1 receptors with 0.5 mg/kg SCH 39166 or 0.1 mg/kg SCH 23390, or by depletion of dopamine stores after 5 mg/kg reserpine + 150 mg/kg alpha-methyltyrosine. Treatment with SCH 39166, SCH 23390 or reserpine + alpha-methyltyrosine reduced acetylcholine release by about a maximum of 30%. Stimulation of dopamine D2 receptors with LY 171555 (quinpirole) at a low, sedative dose (0.05 mg/kg) reduced acetylcholine release by about 30% with no further reduction at higher doses up to 1 mg/kg. Moreover, LY 171555 (0.1 mg/kg) given to SCH 39166 (0.5 mg/kg)- or SKF 38393 (20 mg/kg)-pretreated rats did not decrease acetylcholine release, suggesting that its effect is through a dopamine D1 receptor-mediated mechanism. In contrast, in dopamine-depleted rats, LY 171555 0.1 mg/kg became more effective in decreasing acetylcholine release (about 70%) also after SCH 39166 (0.5 mg/kg) pretreatment (about 80%), thus acting independently of dopamine D1 receptor mechanisms. These results indicate that, in normal circumstances, endogenous dopamine facilitates striatal acetylcholine release through dopamine D1 receptors. The results argue against the commonly accepted view that dopamine D2 receptors exert a tonic inhibitory control on acetylcholine release. Moreover, they suggest that dopamine D2 receptors, in circumstances of dopamine depletion, may exert an inhibitory control on acetylcholine release independent of dopamine D1 receptor mechanisms.
采用脑微透析技术研究了多巴胺传递对纹状体乙酰胆碱释放的作用。用(-)-舒必利或氟哌啶醇阻断多巴胺D2受体可使乙酰胆碱释放增加,最高可达80%(分别在给予50mg/kg和0.5mg/kg后)。用0.5mg/kg SCH 39166或0.1mg/kg SCH 23390阻断多巴胺D1受体,或在给予5mg/kg利血平+150mg/kgα-甲基酪氨酸后耗尽多巴胺储存,可防止这种作用。用SCH 39166、SCH 23390或利血平+α-甲基酪氨酸处理可使乙酰胆碱释放最多减少约30%。用低剂量(0.05mg/kg)的LY 171555(喹吡罗)刺激多巴胺D2受体可使乙酰胆碱释放减少约30%,在高达1mg/kg的更高剂量下无进一步减少。此外,给予SCH 39166(0.5mg/kg)或SKF 38393(20mg/kg)预处理的大鼠LY 171555(0.1mg/kg)不会降低乙酰胆碱释放,表明其作用是通过多巴胺D1受体介导的机制。相反,在多巴胺耗竭的大鼠中,LY 171555 0.1mg/kg在SCH 39166(0.5mg/kg)预处理(约80%)后也更有效地降低乙酰胆碱释放(约70%),因此其作用独立于多巴胺D1受体机制。这些结果表明,在正常情况下,内源性多巴胺通过多巴胺D1受体促进纹状体乙酰胆碱释放。这些结果与普遍接受的观点相悖,即多巴胺D2受体对乙酰胆碱释放发挥紧张性抑制控制作用。此外,它们表明,在多巴胺耗竭的情况下,多巴胺D2受体可能独立于多巴胺D1受体机制对乙酰胆碱释放发挥抑制控制作用。