• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轻度至中度原发性舒张期高血压患者初始抗高血压治疗的成本最小化分析。

Cost-minimization analysis of initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate essential diastolic hypertension.

作者信息

Hilleman D E, Mohiuddin S M, Lucas B D, Stading J A, Stoysich A M, Ryschon K

机构信息

Creighton University Cardiac Center, Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1994 Jan-Feb;16(1):88-102; discussion 87.

PMID:7911403
Abstract

In addition to efficacy and safety, the cost of therapy has become an increasingly important factor to consider when selecting drugs to treat patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension. However, acquisition prices alone do not determine the total cost of therapy. To better assess total costs, we conducted a systematic, retrospective, cost-minimization analysis of drugs used to treat 673 patients with newly diagnosed, mild-to-moderate (> 95 to < 110 mmHg) diastolic hypertension between the years 1985 and 1992. Patients included in the study had started antihypertensive monotherapy, and a minimum of one dose titration was required before adding another antihypertensive agent to the regimen. A patient had to have a diastolic blood pressure of < or = 90 mmHg while undergoing therapy to be included in the analysis. Drug classes included diuretics, beta-adrenergic blockers, centrally acting alpha 2-agonists, alpha 1-adrenergic blockers, calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Costs, adjusted to 1992 price levels, were analyzed for 32 individual agents for each of the following five cost variables: initial drug acquisition, supplemental drug acquisition, laboratory monitoring, clinic visits, and treatment of side effects. Mean total costs per patient for all five variables by drug class were $895 for beta-blockers, $1043 for diuretics, $1165 for centrally acting alpha 2-agonists, $1243 for ACE inhibitors, $1288 for alpha 1-blockers, and $1425 for calcium channel blockers. However, costs within each class varied considerably. Acquisition cost was often a poor predictor of the total cost of treatment. Therefore, acquisition cost must be considered in conjunction with a number of outcome variables to assess the true cost of antihypertensive therapy.

摘要

除疗效和安全性外,治疗成本已成为选择治疗轻至中度高血压患者的药物时需要考虑的一个越来越重要的因素。然而,仅采购价格并不能决定治疗的总成本。为了更好地评估总成本,我们对1985年至1992年间用于治疗673例新诊断的轻至中度(舒张压>95至<110 mmHg)舒张期高血压患者的药物进行了一项系统的、回顾性的成本最小化分析。纳入研究的患者开始接受抗高血压单药治疗,并且在将另一种抗高血压药物添加到治疗方案之前需要至少一次剂量滴定。患者在接受治疗时舒张压必须≤90 mmHg才能纳入分析。药物类别包括利尿剂、β-肾上腺素能阻滞剂、中枢作用的α2-激动剂、α1-肾上腺素能阻滞剂、钙通道阻滞剂和血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂。针对以下五个成本变量,对32种个体药物的成本进行了分析,成本已调整至1992年的价格水平:初始药物采购、补充药物采购、实验室监测、门诊就诊和副作用治疗。按药物类别划分,所有五个变量的每位患者平均总成本分别为:β受体阻滞剂895美元、利尿剂1043美元、中枢作用的α2-激动剂1165美元、ACE抑制剂1243美元、α1-阻滞剂1288美元、钙通道阻滞剂1425美元。然而,每个类别中的成本差异很大。采购成本往往不能很好地预测治疗总成本。因此,必须结合多个结果变量来考虑采购成本,以评估抗高血压治疗的真实成本。

相似文献

1
Cost-minimization analysis of initial antihypertensive therapy in patients with mild-to-moderate essential diastolic hypertension.轻度至中度原发性舒张期高血压患者初始抗高血压治疗的成本最小化分析。
Clin Ther. 1994 Jan-Feb;16(1):88-102; discussion 87.
2
Shifting trends in the pharmacologic treatment of hypertension in a Nigerian tertiary hospital: a real-world evaluation of the efficacy, safety, rationality and pharmaco-economics of old and newer antihypertensive drugs.尼日利亚一家三级医院高血压药物治疗的趋势变化:对新旧抗高血压药物的疗效、安全性、合理性和药物经济学的真实世界评估
J Hum Hypertens. 2003 Apr;17(4):277-85. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001538.
3
Efficacy and safety of a therapeutic interchange from high-dose calcium channel blockers to a fixed-dose combination of amlodipine/benazepril in patients with moderate-to-severe hypertension.中重度高血压患者从高剂量钙通道阻滞剂治疗转换为氨氯地平/贝那普利固定剂量联合治疗的疗效与安全性
J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Aug;15(8):559-65. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1001230.
4
Consumption and costs of antihypertensive drugs in Mexico: are diuretic agents a standing technological trajectory?墨西哥抗高血压药物的消费与成本:利尿剂是否构成一条持续的技术轨迹?
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006 Mar;2(1):22-37. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2005.10.001.
5
Antihypertensive drug prescription trends at the primary health care centres in Bahrain.巴林初级卫生保健中心的抗高血压药物处方趋势
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2001 May;10(3):219-27. doi: 10.1002/pds.578.
6
Cost analysis of different pharmacological treatment strategies in elderly hypertensives.老年高血压患者不同药物治疗策略的成本分析
Blood Press. 2005;14(2):107-13. doi: 10.1080/08037050510008940.
7
Antihypertensive pharmacotherapy in a developing economy: pattern, acquisition costs and conformity to international guidelines in a tertiary-care setting.发展中经济体的抗高血压药物治疗:三级医疗环境中的模式、购置成本及与国际指南的符合情况
J Hum Hypertens. 2006 Nov;20(11):894-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.jhh.1002080. Epub 2006 Aug 10.
8
Evaluation of the total cost of treating elderly hypertensive patients with ACE inhibitors: a comparison of older and newer agents.评估使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗老年高血压患者的总成本:新旧药物对比
Pharmacotherapy. 1997 Sep-Oct;17(5):1011-6.
9
[German Hypertension League update. What does the ALLHAT Study really mean?].[德国高血压联盟最新消息。ALLHAT研究究竟意味着什么?]
MMW Fortschr Med. 2003 Jun 5;145(23):45-6.
10
Cardiovascular events in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension. A subgroup analysis of treatment strategies in STOP-Hypertension-2.老年单纯收缩期高血压患者的心血管事件。STOP-Hypertension-2研究中治疗策略的亚组分析。
Blood Press. 2004;13(3):137-41. doi: 10.1080/08037050410014944.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of nitrendipine and hydrochlorothiazide or metoprolol to treat hypertension in rural community health centers in China.在中国农村社区卫生中心使用硝苯地平与氢氯噻嗪或美托洛尔治疗高血压的成本效益
J Hypertens. 2017 Apr;35(4):886-892. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000001209.
2
An economic evaluation of antihypertensive therapies based on clinical trials.基于临床试验的降压治疗的经济学评价。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2012;67(1):41-8. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2012(01)07.
3
The economic impact of hypertension.高血压的经济影响。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2003 May-Jun;5(3 Suppl 2):3-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2003.02463.x.
4
Cost-effectiveness of hypertension treatment: a population-based study.高血压治疗的成本效益:一项基于人群的研究。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2002 Jul 4;120(4):100-4. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802002000400002.
5
Pharmacoeconomics of hypertension management: the place of combination therapy.高血压管理的药物经济学:联合治疗的地位
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(4):337-47. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119040-00002.
6
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in the management of hypertension.高血压管理中的药物经济学考量
Drugs. 2000;59 Suppl 2:13-20; discussion 39-40. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059002-00002.
7
To pay or not to pay? A decision and cost-utility analysis of angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor therapy for diabetic nephropathy.支付还是不支付?糖尿病肾病血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的决策与成本效益分析。
CMAJ. 2000 Jan 25;162(2):195-8.
8
Common errors and controversies in pharmacoeconomic analyses.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Jun;13(6):659-66. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813060-00002.
9
Cost considerations in the drug treatment of hypertension. Is older better?高血压药物治疗中的成本考量。越老越好吗?
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Apr;9(4):283-5. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199609040-00001.
10
Translating safety, efficacy and compliance into economic value for controlled release dosage forms.将控释剂型的安全性、有效性和依从性转化为经济价值。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1994 Jun;5(6):482-504. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199405060-00005.