Boeke A J, de Lange J J, van Druenen B, Langemeijer J J
Department of Anaesthesiology, De Wever Hospital, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Br J Anaesth. 1994 Jun;72(6):654-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/72.6.654.
Eighty patients undergoing outpatient surgery under general anaesthesia were allocated randomly to two groups: in group A residual neuromuscular block was antagonized with a mixture of neostigmine 1.5 mg and atropine 0.5 mg; in group B spontaneous recovery was allowed. The patients were assessed after operation in hospital and 24 h after discharge. We found a significant difference (P < 0.05) in requirements for antiemetic therapy with a smaller need in the group which received neostigmine (in group A four of 40 patients received an antiemetic compared with 12 in group B). There was no significant difference in frequency of nausea or vomiting between the two groups. The incidence of postoperative nausea was 14 in group A and 18 in group B and the number of patients with postoperative vomiting was 10 in group A and 15 in group B.
80例接受全身麻醉下门诊手术的患者被随机分为两组:A组用1.5毫克新斯的明和0.5毫克阿托品的混合物拮抗残余神经肌肉阻滞;B组则任其自然恢复。患者在术后住院期间及出院后24小时接受评估。我们发现,在使用止吐治疗方面存在显著差异(P<0.05),接受新斯的明治疗的组需求较小(A组40例患者中有4例接受了止吐药,而B组为12例)。两组之间恶心或呕吐的频率无显著差异。A组术后恶心的发生率为14例,B组为18例;A组术后呕吐的患者人数为10例,B组为15例。