Wright P M, Hart P, Lau M, Sharma M L, Gruenke L, Fisher D M
Department of Anesthesia, University of California, San Francisco 94143-0648.
Anesthesiology. 1994 Jul;81(1):59-68; discussion 27A.
Cumulative effects (increased 25-75% recovery time with increasing dose) are evident with vecuronium but not with atracurium. Pharmacokinetic simulations suggest that vecuronium's cumulation occurs as recovery shifts from distribution to elimination whereas atracurium's recovery always occurs during elimination. The purpose of this study was to examine this pharmacokinetic explanation.
We assigned 12 volunteers to receive atracurium of vecuronium on three occasions during nitrous oxide-isoflurane anesthesia. Evoked adductor pollicis twitch tension was monitored. On occasion 1, the dose expected to produce 95% block (ED95) was estimated for each subject. On occasions 2 and 3, 1.2 or 3.0 multiples of ED95 were given as a bolus. Plasma was sampled for 128 min to determine muscle relaxant concentrations; pharmacodynamic modeling was used to determine effect-compartment drug concentrations (Ce). For each drug, recovery time, recovery phase half-life (rate of decrease in Ce during recovery), and Ce at 25% and 75% recovery were compared between doses.
Atracurium's recovery time increased 2.4 +/- 2.2 min (mean +/- SD) with the larger dose, less than the increase with vecuronium (8.2 +/- 3.8 min). Atracurium's recovery phase half-life was 14.6 +/- 1.7 and 20.1 +/- 2.3 min with the small and large doses (P < 0.05); vecuronium's recovery phase half-life increased similarly from 13.5 +/- 2.3 to 18.5 +/- 5.0 min (P < 0.05). At 75% recovery, vecuronium's Ce decreased from 65 +/- 18 ng/ml with the small dose to 55 +/- 15 ng/ml with the large dose (P < 0.05). Assuming that neuromuscular junction sensitivity was constant, this difference could be explained by considering neuromuscular effects of vecuronium's metabolite, 3-desacetylvecuronium.
Although vecuronium was cumulative (as predicted), atracurium was also slightly cumulative. Inconsistent with our hypothesis, recovery phase half-lives for both drugs increased similarly between doses; therefore, differences in cumulation were not solely explained by pharmacokinetics of the muscle relaxant. It appears that 3-desacetylvecuronium contributes to vecuronium's cumulative effect, even after usual clinical doses.
维库溴铵存在累积效应(随着剂量增加,恢复时间延长25% - 75%),而阿曲库铵不存在。药代动力学模拟表明,维库溴铵的累积是由于恢复过程从分布阶段转变为消除阶段,而阿曲库铵的恢复始终发生在消除阶段。本研究旨在检验这一药代动力学解释。
我们将12名志愿者分配在氧化亚氮 - 异氟烷麻醉期间分三次接受阿曲库铵或维库溴铵。监测拇内收肌诱发抽搐张力。在第1次给药时,为每个受试者估算预期产生95%阻滞作用的剂量(ED95)。在第2次和第3次给药时,分别静脉推注1.2倍或3.0倍ED95的剂量。采集血浆128分钟以测定肌肉松弛剂浓度;采用药效学模型确定效应室药物浓度(Ce)。比较每种药物不同剂量之间的恢复时间、恢复相半衰期(恢复期间Ce的下降速率)以及恢复25%和75%时的Ce。
阿曲库铵较大剂量时的恢复时间增加了2.4±2.2分钟(均值±标准差),小于维库溴铵的增加幅度(8.2±3.8分钟)。阿曲库铵小剂量和大剂量时的恢复相半衰期分别为14.6±1.7分钟和20.1±2.3分钟(P<0.05);维库溴铵的恢复相半衰期也类似地从13.5±2.3分钟增加到18.5±5.0分钟(P<0.05)。在恢复75%时,维库溴铵的Ce从小剂量时的65±18纳克/毫升降至大剂量时的55±15纳克/毫升(P<0.05)。假设神经肌肉接头敏感性恒定,这种差异可以通过考虑维库溴铵的代谢产物3 - 去乙酰维库溴铵的神经肌肉效应来解释。
尽管维库溴铵存在累积效应(如预期),阿曲库铵也有轻微累积。与我们的假设不符的是,两种药物的恢复相半衰期在不同剂量之间的增加幅度相似;因此,累积差异不能仅由肌肉松弛剂的药代动力学来解释。似乎即使在常规临床剂量后,3 - 去乙酰维库溴铵也对维库溴铵的累积效应有贡献。