Cohen R J, Brown K H, Canahuati J, Rivera L L, Dewey K G
Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis 95616-8669.
Lancet. 1994 Jul 30;344(8918):288-93. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)91337-4.
In developing countries, the age at which breastfed infants are first given complementary foods is of public health importance because of the risk of diarrhoeal disease from contaminated weaning foods, and the potential risk of growth faltering if foods are inappropriately delayed. To evaluate whether there are any advantage of complementary feeding prior to 6 months, low-income primiparous mothers who had exclusively breastfed for 4 months were randomly assigned to one of 3 groups: continued exclusive breastfeeding to 6 months (EBF) (n = 50); introduction of complementary foods at 4 months with ad libitum nursing from 4-6 months (SF) (n = 47); and introduction of complementary foods at 4 months, with maintenance of baseline nursing frequency from 4-6 months (SF-M) (n = 44). Baby foods in jars were provided to the SF and SF-M groups from 4 to 6 months. Subjects were visited weekly and provided with lactation guidance; at 4, 5, and 6 months measurements were made of infant intake and breast milk composition. At 4 months, breast milk intake averaged 797 (139) g per day (no difference among groups). Between 4 and 6 months, breast milk intake was unchanged in EBF infants (+6) but decreased in the SF (-103), and SF-M (-62) groups (p < 0.001). Change in total energy intake (including solid foods) and infant weight and length gain did not differ significantly between groups. Weight and length gain from 4-6 months were comparable to those of breastfed infants in an affluent USA population. The results indicate that breastfed infants self-regulate their total energy intake when other foods are introduced. As a result, there is no advantage in introducing complementary foods before 6 months in this population, whereas there may be disadvantages if there is increased exposure to contaminated weaning foods.
在发展中国家,母乳喂养婴儿首次添加辅食的年龄具有公共卫生意义,这是因为断奶食品受污染会有患腹泻病的风险,而如果辅食添加不当延迟则可能有生长发育迟缓的潜在风险。为评估6个月前添加辅食是否有任何益处,将纯母乳喂养4个月的低收入初产妇随机分为3组:继续纯母乳喂养至6个月(纯母乳喂养组,EBF)(n = 50);4个月时添加辅食,并在4至6个月按需哺乳(辅食添加组,SF)(n = 47);4个月时添加辅食,并在4至6个月维持基线哺乳频率(辅食添加维持频率组,SF-M)(n = 44)。从4至6个月为辅食添加组和辅食添加维持频率组提供罐装婴儿食品。每周对受试者进行访视并提供哺乳指导;在4、5和6个月时测量婴儿摄入量和母乳成分。4个月时,母乳摄入量平均每天为797(139)克(各组间无差异)。在4至6个月期间,纯母乳喂养组婴儿的母乳摄入量没有变化(增加了6克),但辅食添加组(减少了103克)和辅食添加维持频率组(减少了62克)的母乳摄入量下降(p < 0.001)。各组间总能量摄入量(包括固体食物)的变化以及婴儿体重和身长增加没有显著差异。4至6个月的体重和身长增加与美国富裕人群中母乳喂养婴儿的情况相当。结果表明,引入其他食物时,母乳喂养婴儿会自我调节总能量摄入量。因此,在该人群中6个月前引入辅食没有益处,而如果增加接触受污染断奶食品的机会则可能有不利之处。