Suppr超能文献

使用可吸收和不可吸收缝合材料进行剖腹手术伤口的分层缝合。

Layer closure of laparotomy wounds with absorbable and non-absorbable suture materials.

作者信息

Irvin T T, Koffman C G, Duthie H L

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1976 Oct;63(10):793-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800631015.

Abstract

Opinions vary regarding the best suture material for abdominal wound closure. Some surgeons favour non-absorbable sutures while others use absorbable materials, but there is little objective clinical information regarding the relative merits of the different suture materials. In a randomized prospective clinical trial the synthetic absorbable polyglactin and polyglycolic acid sutures were compared with the non-absorbable polypropylene suture in the closure of 161 laparotomy wounds. A layered closure technique was used in all cases. The total incidence of wound dehiscence and herniation was 8-1 per cent, and there was no significant difference between polylycolic acid (9-6 per cent), polyglactin (5-8 per cent) and polypropylene (8-8 per cent). Dehiscence and herniation were significantly more common in wounds closed by surgeons in training. It was concluded that none of the suture materials provided satisfactory freedom from wound complications. It is possible that these sutures may prove satisfactory with an alternative technique of abdominal wound closure, but this should be the subject of further clinical studies.

摘要

关于腹部伤口缝合的最佳缝合材料,意见不一。一些外科医生倾向于使用不可吸收缝线,而另一些则使用可吸收材料,但关于不同缝合材料相对优点的客观临床信息很少。在一项随机前瞻性临床试验中,将合成可吸收聚乙醇酸缝线和聚乳酸缝线与不可吸收聚丙烯缝线用于161例剖腹手术伤口的缝合进行比较。所有病例均采用分层缝合技术。伤口裂开和疝形成的总发生率为8.1%,聚乙醇酸(9.6%)、聚乳酸(5.8%)和聚丙烯(8.8%)之间无显著差异。在接受培训的外科医生缝合的伤口中,裂开和疝形成明显更常见。得出的结论是,没有一种缝合材料能令人满意地避免伤口并发症。这些缝线采用另一种腹部伤口缝合技术可能会证明是令人满意的,但这应该是进一步临床研究的主题。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验