Suppr超能文献

三种剖腹手术伤口缝合方法的对照临床试验。

A controlled clinical trial of three methods of closure of laparotomy wounds.

作者信息

Goligher J C, Irvin T T, Johnston D, De Dombal F T, Hill G L, Horrocks J C

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1975 Oct;62(10):823-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800621019.

Abstract

A controlled clinical trial was conducted of three methods of closing elective paramedian laparotomy wounds--catgut layer suture alone, catgut layer suture with tension sutures and wire sutures alone. Three hundred and twenty-four patients were entered in the trial. The combined incidence of wound dehiscence and subsequent incisional herniation in patients who did not manifest overt dehiscence in the immediate postoperative period was significantly higher after catgut layer suture alone (14 per cent) than after catgut layer suture with tension stitches (4-8 per cent) or wire sutures alone (0-9 per cent). There seemed to be more wound sespis and sinus formation associated with catgut layer suture and tension sutures than with either of the other methods of closure. In 4 patients a wire suture had to be extracted, because of sinus formation in 2 and on account of pain in 2.

摘要

对三种关闭选择性旁正中剖腹手术伤口的方法进行了一项对照临床试验,这三种方法分别是单纯肠线分层缝合、肠线分层缝合加张力缝合以及单纯钢丝缝合。共有324例患者参与了该试验。在术后即刻未出现明显伤口裂开的患者中,单纯肠线分层缝合后伤口裂开及随后发生切口疝的综合发生率(14%)显著高于肠线分层缝合加张力缝合(4 - 8%)或单纯钢丝缝合(0 - 9%)。与其他两种关闭方法相比,肠线分层缝合加张力缝合似乎更多地伴有伤口脓毒症和窦道形成。有4例患者不得不取出钢丝缝线,其中2例是因为形成窦道,2例是因为疼痛。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验