Suppr超能文献

冠心病患者个体内比较中加洛帕米与艾司洛尔的抗缺血作用

[Anti-ischemia effects of gallopamil and esmolol in an intra-individual comparison in patients with coronary heart disease].

作者信息

Mitrovic V, Oehm E, Minge C, Thürmann P, Schlepper M

机构信息

Abteilung für Klinische Pharmakologie, Johann-Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt/Main.

出版信息

Z Kardiol. 1994 Jun;83(6):431-8.

PMID:7915067
Abstract

To compare the hemodynamic, antiischemic, metabolic, and neurohumoral effects of intravenous esmolol (beta 1 blocking agent) and gallopamil (verapamil-like calcium channel blocker), 14 patients with angiographically proven CAD and reproducible ST segment depression were studied at rest and during exercise under control conditions and after an intravenous bolus injection of esmolol (0.5 mg/kg/1 min, followed by an infusion with 0.2 mg/kg/min) or gallopamil (0.025 mg/kg/3 min). In contrast to gallopamil, esmolol significantly reduced systolic blood pressure (175.7 vs. 160 mm Hg) and heart rate (107.4 vs. 96.9 min-1) during exercise as well as cardiac output (11.57 vs. 9.38 l/min) and significantly enhanced systemic vascular resistance both at rest (1241 vs. 1479 dynes.s.cm-5) and during exercise (805 vs. 947 dynes.s.cm-5). On the other hand, exercise filling pressures and lactate levels (3.66 vs. 3.05 mmol/l) were significantly reduced by gallopamil only. Thus, the significant improvement of exercise tolerance by both esmolol and gallopamil is based on different mechanisms of action: esmolol improves myocardial ischemia by appreciably reducing myocardial oxygen consumption, whereas gallopamil primarily improves oxygen supply and ventricular performance. Plasma catecholamines, atrial natriuretic factor, and aldosterone levels as well as plasma renin activity were identically influenced by esmolol and gallopamil, respectively. A reflex activation of the sympathetic system did not occur.

摘要

为比较静脉注射艾司洛尔(β1阻滞剂)和加洛帕米(维拉帕米样钙通道阻滞剂)的血流动力学、抗缺血、代谢及神经体液效应,对14例经血管造影证实患有冠心病且静息和运动时可再现ST段压低的患者,在对照条件下以及静脉推注艾司洛尔(0.5mg/kg/1分钟,随后以0.2mg/kg/分钟输注)或加洛帕米(0.025mg/kg/3分钟)后进行了研究。与加洛帕米相反,艾司洛尔在运动期间显著降低收缩压(175.7对160mmHg)、心率(107.4对96.9次/分钟)以及心输出量(11.57对9.38升/分钟),并在静息时(1241对1479达因·秒/厘米⁻⁵)和运动期间(805对947达因·秒/厘米⁻⁵)显著增强全身血管阻力。另一方面,仅加洛帕米显著降低运动充盈压和乳酸水平(3.66对3.05mmol/L)。因此,艾司洛尔和加洛帕米对运动耐量的显著改善基于不同的作用机制:艾司洛尔通过明显降低心肌耗氧量改善心肌缺血,而加洛帕米主要改善氧供应和心室功能。血浆儿茶酚胺、心房利钠因子以及醛固酮水平以及血浆肾素活性分别受到艾司洛尔和加洛帕米相同的影响。未发生交感神经系统的反射性激活。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验