Johansson A M, Grol C J, Karlén A, Hacksell U
Department of Organic Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Uppsala University, Sweden.
Drug Des Discov. 1994 Feb;11(2):159-74.
To evaluate a previously suggested "dopamine (DA) D2 receptor agonist pharmacophore model" the N-propyl derivatives (1S,2S)-5-hydroxy-1-methyl-2-propylaminotetralin [(1S,2S)-3)] and trans-(+/-)-5-hydroxy-3-methyl-2-propylaminotetralin [(+/-)-4] were synthesized and their conformational preferences were studied by molecular mechanics calculations. The new compounds were evaluated for affinity to striatal DA D2 receptors labelled by [3H]spiroperidol and [3H]N-propylnorapomorphine. In comparison to the corresponding N,N-dipropyl derivatives, compounds (1S,2S)-3 and (+/-)-4 more readily adopt pharmacophore conformations and have higher affinity for DA D2 receptors. Thus, the pharmacophore model for C5-oxygenated 2-aminotetralins appears to be accurate. The DA D2 receptor binding affinities of a series of C1- or C3-methyl substituted 5- or 7-hydroxy-2-dipropylaminotetralin derivatives were also determined to enable a comparison of three different modes of superposition, of 7- and 5-hydroxylated 2-aminotetralin derivatives. The results show that the relative spatial positions of the C1- and C3-methyl groups resulting from the various superpositions of 5- and 7-hydroxylated regioisomers differ and the fact that the bulk of a methyl group may be readily accepted by the receptor does not necessarily indicate that additional bulk may be tolerated. Consequently, a definitive choice of mode of superposition of 5- and 7-hydroxylated regioisomers can not be made at present and has to wait until the binding site itself has been better defined.
为评估先前提出的“多巴胺(DA)D2受体激动剂药效团模型”,合成了N-丙基衍生物(1S,2S)-5-羟基-1-甲基-2-丙基氨基四氢萘[(1S,2S)-3]和反式(±)-5-羟基-3-甲基-2-丙基氨基四氢萘[(±)-4],并通过分子力学计算研究了它们的构象偏好。用[3H]螺哌啶醇和[3H]N-丙基去甲阿扑吗啡标记纹状体DA D2受体,评估了新化合物对该受体的亲和力。与相应的N,N-二丙基衍生物相比,化合物(1S,2S)-3和(±)-4更容易采取药效团构象,并且对DA D2受体具有更高的亲和力。因此,C5-氧化的2-氨基四氢萘的药效团模型似乎是准确的。还测定了一系列C1-或C3-甲基取代的5-或7-羟基-2-二丙基氨基四氢萘衍生物的DA D2受体结合亲和力,以便比较7-和5-羟基化的2-氨基四氢萘衍生物的三种不同叠加模式。结果表明,5-和7-羟基化区域异构体的各种叠加产生的C1-和C3-甲基基团的相对空间位置不同,并且甲基的大部分可能容易被受体接受这一事实并不一定表明可以容忍额外的基团。因此,目前无法确定5-和7-羟基化区域异构体的叠加模式,必须等到结合位点本身得到更好的定义。