Norcini J J
University City Science Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2675.
Acad Med. 1994 Oct;69(10 Suppl):S90-4. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199410000-00053.
To summarize, this paper presents three goals for an ideal rectification program. Based on these goals, two dimensions of an evaluation system for recertification are described. The first dimension focuses on what needs to be assessed and how it is measured, including assessments of practice, potential, and nontechnical aspects of practice. The second dimension is composed of three issues that cut across the assessment components: pathways to recertification, content of the assessments, and standards. It will take decades for the Boards work through these issues, but the result will be credibility in the eyes of the public and enhanced recognition in the eyes of the profession.
总之，本文提出了理想的认证计划的三个目标。基于这些目标，描述了再认证评估系统的两个维度。第一个维度关注需要评估的内容及其衡量方式，包括对实践、潜力和实践非技术方面的评估。第二个维度由贯穿评估组件的三个问题组成：再认证途径、评估内容和标准。委员会解决这些问题需要数十年时间，但结果将是在公众眼中获得可信度，并在专业领域中获得更高认可度。
