Suppr超能文献

米氮平与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症住院患者的双盲研究。

Double-blind study of mirtazapine and placebo in hospitalized patients with major depression.

作者信息

Vartiainen H, Leinonen E

机构信息

University of Kuopio, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1994 Jun;4(2):145-50. doi: 10.1016/0924-977x(94)90008-6.

Abstract

The purpose of the present 6-week multicenter dose finding study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine (preferentially presynaptic alpha 2-adrenergic receptor blocker) to placebo in hospitalized patients with major depression. The clinical efficacy was evaluated with the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Self-Rating Depression Scale, Global Assessment Scale (GAS), and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). The side effects were recorded on a checklist of emergent symptoms (ROSE) and physical examinations, ECG, clinical chemistry, and hematology tests were carried out. The dosages of mirtazapine were gradually raised from 15 mg to 50 mg. One hundred and fourteen patients were included. Twenty-two patients (37%) in mirtazapine group and 24 (44%) in the placebo group were prematurely withdrawn from the study mainly due to inadequate efficacy. The decrease in HAM-D and MADRS was generally more pronounced in the mirtazapine group than in the placebo group. Minor side effects were reported in less than 15% of the patients in both groups. Only fatigue and faintness were slightly more pronounced in the mirtazapine group than in the placebo group. No significant changes were found in laboratory parameters. Because of methodological flaws like combining a dose finding study with a placebo controlled study, further conclusions should not be made on the efficacy of mirtazapine when treating depressive patients.

摘要

本为期6周的多中心剂量探索性研究旨在比较米氮平(优先作用于突触前α2肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂)与安慰剂对重度抑郁症住院患者的疗效和耐受性。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、贝克抑郁自评量表、总体评定量表(GAS)和简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评估临床疗效。通过突发症状清单(ROSE)记录副作用,并进行体格检查、心电图、临床化学和血液学检查。米氮平剂量从15毫克逐渐增至50毫克。共纳入114例患者。米氮平组22例患者(37%)和安慰剂组24例患者(44%)主要因疗效不佳而提前退出研究。米氮平组HAM-D和MADRS评分的下降通常比安慰剂组更明显。两组均有不到15%的患者报告有轻微副作用。仅米氮平组的疲劳和头晕比安慰剂组略明显。实验室参数未发现显著变化。由于存在如将剂量探索性研究与安慰剂对照研究相结合等方法学缺陷,因此不应就米氮平治疗抑郁症患者的疗效得出进一步结论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验