• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

米氮平与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症住院患者的双盲研究。

Double-blind study of mirtazapine and placebo in hospitalized patients with major depression.

作者信息

Vartiainen H, Leinonen E

机构信息

University of Kuopio, Department of Forensic Psychiatry, Niuvanniemi Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1994 Jun;4(2):145-50. doi: 10.1016/0924-977x(94)90008-6.

DOI:10.1016/0924-977x(94)90008-6
PMID:7919944
Abstract

The purpose of the present 6-week multicenter dose finding study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine (preferentially presynaptic alpha 2-adrenergic receptor blocker) to placebo in hospitalized patients with major depression. The clinical efficacy was evaluated with the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), Beck Self-Rating Depression Scale, Global Assessment Scale (GAS), and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). The side effects were recorded on a checklist of emergent symptoms (ROSE) and physical examinations, ECG, clinical chemistry, and hematology tests were carried out. The dosages of mirtazapine were gradually raised from 15 mg to 50 mg. One hundred and fourteen patients were included. Twenty-two patients (37%) in mirtazapine group and 24 (44%) in the placebo group were prematurely withdrawn from the study mainly due to inadequate efficacy. The decrease in HAM-D and MADRS was generally more pronounced in the mirtazapine group than in the placebo group. Minor side effects were reported in less than 15% of the patients in both groups. Only fatigue and faintness were slightly more pronounced in the mirtazapine group than in the placebo group. No significant changes were found in laboratory parameters. Because of methodological flaws like combining a dose finding study with a placebo controlled study, further conclusions should not be made on the efficacy of mirtazapine when treating depressive patients.

摘要

本为期6周的多中心剂量探索性研究旨在比较米氮平(优先作用于突触前α2肾上腺素能受体阻滞剂)与安慰剂对重度抑郁症住院患者的疗效和耐受性。采用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAM-D)、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)、贝克抑郁自评量表、总体评定量表(GAS)和简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)评估临床疗效。通过突发症状清单(ROSE)记录副作用,并进行体格检查、心电图、临床化学和血液学检查。米氮平剂量从15毫克逐渐增至50毫克。共纳入114例患者。米氮平组22例患者(37%)和安慰剂组24例患者(44%)主要因疗效不佳而提前退出研究。米氮平组HAM-D和MADRS评分的下降通常比安慰剂组更明显。两组均有不到15%的患者报告有轻微副作用。仅米氮平组的疲劳和头晕比安慰剂组略明显。实验室参数未发现显著变化。由于存在如将剂量探索性研究与安慰剂对照研究相结合等方法学缺陷,因此不应就米氮平治疗抑郁症患者的疗效得出进一步结论。

相似文献

1
Double-blind study of mirtazapine and placebo in hospitalized patients with major depression.米氮平与安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症住院患者的双盲研究。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1994 Jun;4(2):145-50. doi: 10.1016/0924-977x(94)90008-6.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine versus citalopram: a double-blind, randomized study in patients with major depressive disorder. Nordic Antidepressant Study Group.米氮平与西酞普兰的疗效及耐受性:一项针对重度抑郁症患者的双盲、随机研究。北欧抗抑郁药研究小组
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1999 Nov;14(6):329-37. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199911000-00002.
3
Mirtazapine versus venlafaxine in hospitalized severely depressed patients with melancholic features.米氮平与文拉法辛治疗伴有抑郁特征的住院重度抑郁症患者的疗效比较
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001 Aug;21(4):425-31. doi: 10.1097/00004714-200108000-00010.
4
Mirtazapine compared with paroxetine in major depression.米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗重度抑郁症的比较。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2000 Sep;61(9):656-63. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v61n0911.
5
Mirtazapine is more effective than trazodone: a double-blind controlled study in hospitalized patients with major depression.米氮平比曲唑酮更有效:一项针对重度抑郁症住院患者的双盲对照研究。
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1995 Mar;10(1):3-9.
6
Mirtazapine vs. amitriptyline vs. placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder.米氮平与阿米替林及安慰剂治疗重度抑郁症的对比研究
Psychopharmacol Bull. 1990;26(2):191-6.
7
A meta-analysis of eight randomized, double-blind, controlled clinical trials of mirtazapine for the treatment of patients with major depression and symptoms of anxiety.一项关于米氮平治疗重度抑郁症及焦虑症状患者的八项随机、双盲、对照临床试验的荟萃分析。
J Clin Psychiatry. 1998 Mar;59(3):123-7.
8
Comparison of the effects of mirtazapine and fluoxetine in severely depressed patients.米氮平与氟西汀对重度抑郁症患者疗效的比较。
CNS Drugs. 2005;19(2):137-46. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200519020-00004.
9
Double-blind, randomized comparison of mirtazapine and paroxetine in elderly depressed patients.米氮平与帕罗西汀治疗老年抑郁症患者的双盲随机对照研究
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002 Sep-Oct;10(5):541-50.
10
A double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and doxepin in patients with major depression.一项比较米氮平和多塞平对重度抑郁症患者疗效及耐受性的双盲研究。
Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1995 Dec;5(4):441-6. doi: 10.1016/0924-977x(95)00016-i.

引用本文的文献

1
The risks of adverse events with mirtazapine for adults with major depressive disorder: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.米氮平治疗重度抑郁症成人患者的不良事件风险:一项系统评价、荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
BMC Psychiatry. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-06396-6.
2
Central monitoring of depression and anxiety symptoms reduces placebo responses in depression clinical trials: A post hoc exploratory analysis of data from the phase III CCT-004 trial of vortioxetine.中枢监测抑郁和焦虑症状可减少抑郁症临床试验中的安慰剂反应:文拉法辛治疗 3 期 CCT-004 试验数据的事后探索性分析。
Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2022 Dec;42(4):468-477. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12288. Epub 2022 Sep 24.
3
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.
《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2018 Jan 15;48(1):64-153.
4
Efficacy and Tolerability of Generic Mirtazapine (Mirtax) for Major Depressive Disorder: Multicenter, Open-label, Uncontrolled, Prospective Study.通用型米氮平(米他扎平)治疗重度抑郁症的疗效与耐受性:多中心、开放标签、非对照、前瞻性研究
Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2015 Aug 31;13(2):144-9. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2015.13.2.144.
5
Mirtazapine : A Review of its Pharmacology and Therapeutic Potential in the Management of Major Depression.米氮平:其药理学及在重度抑郁症治疗中的潜在应用综述
CNS Drugs. 1996 May;5(5):389-402. doi: 10.2165/00023210-199605050-00007.
6
Randomized, placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants for acute major depression: thirty-year meta-analytic review.抗抑郁药治疗急性重度抑郁症的随机、安慰剂对照试验:三十年的荟萃分析回顾。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012 Mar;37(4):851-64. doi: 10.1038/npp.2011.306. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
7
Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mirtazapine.米氮平的群体药代动力学分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004 Sep;60(7):473-80. doi: 10.1007/s00228-004-0737-0.
8
A review of the pharmacological and clinical profile of mirtazapine.米氮平的药理学与临床概况综述。
CNS Drug Rev. 2001 Fall;7(3):249-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1527-3458.2001.tb00198.x.
9
A risk-benefit assessment of mirtazapine in the treatment of depression.米氮平治疗抑郁症的风险效益评估。
Drug Saf. 1997 Oct;17(4):251-64. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199717040-00005.